Re: [Cooker] test, ignore...

2003-07-20 Thread Oden Eriksson
söndag 20 juli 2003 10:26 em skrev andre: > Also surprised that the mailing list wasn't down No, I had to test my spamassassin setup;) -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com

Re: [Cooker] test, ignore...

2003-07-20 Thread andre
Also surprised that the mailing list wasn't down

Re: [Cooker] test, ignore...

2003-03-26 Thread Oden Eriksson
onsdagen den 26 mars 2003 13.33 skrev Oden Eriksson: i hate not being in control of the damn fw i have to pass..., testing..., testing... -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com

Re: [Cooker] test, ignore

2001-11-19 Thread Clete Blackwell
good, kmail works 4 u :) :) :) (i'm booted in win rite now, bnut kmail werks for me) - Original Message - From: "Oden Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:22 AM Subject: [Cooker] test, ignore > Sorry, needed to test Kmail. > -- > -=-=-=-

Re: [Cooker] test - ignore

2000-07-22 Thread Eugenio Diaz
I did not beleived it either, but a few nights ago I sent quite a few messages (around 5 or 6), and much to my surprise, they never appeared. So after a few days went by, I sent the test, and sure enought it went throught immediately ... What is going on? Pixel replied to some of the emails that

Re: [Cooker] test - ignore

2000-07-21 Thread Thomas SMETS
Well I gess every one has now understood that cooker is much slower than Cooker may be it would be nice for the people who can't thread theit incoming mail that we just ask "them" (mailing list manager) to try to do something when possible ... Thomas, p.s. : This message was (also) sent twic

RE: [Cooker] test - ignore

2000-07-21 Thread B. K. Barley
I'm having the same problem Bryan -Original Message- From: Geoffrey Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Cooker] test - ignore > > hours ago, one to "Cooker" and one to "cooker". The

RE: [Cooker] test - ignore

2000-07-21 Thread Geoffrey Lee
> > hours ago, one to "Cooker" and one to "cooker". The first appeared > > within a few minutes, the second has yet to appear... > > same. > as far as i know the messages with small "c" in the cooker that i posted yesterday all ent to the bit bucket ... :-( > > Of course, two messages is

Re: [Cooker] test - ignore

2000-07-21 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Guy T. Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are we testing the capital vs. small C in "Cooker" theory, by any chance? > I didn't think much of it until today. I posted two messages about 12 > hours ago, one to "Cooker" and one to "cooker". The first appeared > within a few minutes, the second h

Re: [Cooker] test - ignore

2000-07-21 Thread Guy T. Rice
Are we testing the capital vs. small C in "Cooker" theory, by any chance? I didn't think much of it until today. I posted two messages about 12 hours ago, one to "Cooker" and one to "cooker". The first appeared within a few minutes, the second has yet to appear... Of course, two messages is not

Re: [Cooker] test ignore

2000-02-26 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
tracer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am filtering all known mails to their proper boxes to reduce spam. > if the addressee is NOT [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail like yours and > some others end up in my spam box. > Is there any reason for the Mandrake devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > address being used to

Re: [Cooker] test ignore

2000-02-26 Thread tracer
Hello Chmouel Boudjnah, On 24 Feb 2000 16:02:17 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Friday, February 25, 2000, 7:02:17 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com (mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com >[216.71.84.35]) by ruby.granis.net (Build 9

Re: [Cooker] test ignore

2000-02-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > test ok alias work, when you send a mail to devel@ you go on cooker. -- MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ --Chmouel