Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-15 Thread john . cavan
e to put it in the kernel package which would be > better of course. > > > > -- > > > From: Frederic Lepied[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: quinta-feira, 13 de julho de 2000 06:07 > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-14 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Frederic Lepied[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: quinta-feira, 13 de julho de 2000 06:07 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject:Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4 > > > > Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-13 Thread José Luiz Barci Neves
Where i can take a XFREE 4.01 mdk of course ? thanks a lot! > -- > From: Frederic Lepied[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: quinta-feira, 13 de julho de 2000 06:07 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Cooker]

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-13 Thread Frederic Lepied
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Hoyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Isn't the newest 4.0.1 supposed to include the tdfx.0 driver now? > > supposed to, yes. i did not tested it so I don't know. fred? > yes : $ rpm -qlp XFree86-server-4.0.1-2mdk.i586.rpm | grep tdfx /usr

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-12 Thread bobby dowling
If I want direct rendering though, I need at least a 2.3X kernel, right? I guess there is an option for this in a newer kernel? >From: Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XF

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-12 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"Hoyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Isn't the newest 4.0.1 supposed to include the tdfx.0 driver now? supposed to, yes. i did not tested it so I don't know. fred? -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-12 Thread Hoyt
Isn't the newest 4.0.1 supposed to include the tdfx.0 driver now? Hoyt - Original Message - From: "Guillaume Cottenceau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 11:22 AM Subject: Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-12 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
"bobby dowling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a consesus on how to get Mandrake 7.1 + Voodoo3 + Quake3 (or > similar app)? It is easier with XF3 than with XF4. Take the latest Mesa package from Cooker and install the Glide_V3. It should suffice. Try with morph3d from Mesa-demos. I use

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-04 Thread bobby dowling
>Subject: Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4 >Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 07:32:30 -0400 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from [216.71.84.35] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id >MHotMailBB2B16CF0084D8219799D84754231E070; Tue Jul 04 04:34:40 2000 >Received: (from sympa@localhost)by mandrake

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-04 Thread john . cavan
You need the Glide module from the contribs rather than the mainline, the XFree glide module contains the video driver for the older Voodoo cards, not the Voodoo3. The Glide stuff in contribs supplys the glide library for general apps. John Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > Hi, > > Just my final

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-04 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Armisis Aieoln <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > where/how do we prepend a > > LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libglide3x.so.2 to the programs? like defining a variable on a commandline: LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libglide3x.so.2 gears you can ofcourse perform "export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libglide3x.so.2" (but it's

Re: [Cooker] 3dfx voodoo3 with XFree4

2000-07-04 Thread Armisis Aieoln
where/how do we prepend a > LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libglide3x.so.2 to the programs? Im fighting to get my banshee to work at all with xf4 still fighting on getting the tdfx.o module and getting it installed dave On Tue, 04 Jul 2000, you wrote: > Hi, > > Just my final report about using