Re: [Cooker] IDE patches unstable?

2000-07-13 Thread Eugenio Diaz
--- "Guy T. Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 07 Jul 2000, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > > > I don't think it's an eide driver bug : it's just > that the new driver stress > > more hardware (if your eide hd and controller > reports to support udma, you > > just want to use it). > > Huh. Ac

Re: [Cooker] IDE patches unstable?

2000-07-13 Thread Guy T. Rice
On Fri, 07 Jul 2000, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > I don't think it's an eide driver bug : it's just that the new driver stress > more hardware (if your eide hd and controller reports to support udma, you > just want to use it). Huh. According to hdparm, it's not using dma at all. /dev/hdb: multc

Re: [Cooker] IDE patches unstable?

2000-07-07 Thread Civileme
Eugenio Diaz wrote: > > For me, it's a hardware bug (hd or cable; eg, for > > udma66, lots of read error > > were due to bad cables ...) > > No way! > > The 2.2.17-*mdk rpms have IDE fucked up. On my machine > it hangs (lock keys don't switch lights) when it goes > to check the partition tables,

Re: [Cooker] IDE patches unstable?

2000-07-07 Thread Eugenio Diaz
> For me, it's a hardware bug (hd or cable; eg, for > udma66, lots of read error > were due to bad cables ...) No way! The 2.2.17-*mdk rpms have IDE fucked up. On my machine it hangs (lock keys don't switch lights) when it goes to check the partition tables, with an UDMA time-out. 2.2.16-9mdk w

Re: [Cooker] IDE patches unstable?

2000-07-07 Thread Thierry Vignaud
"Guy T. Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I installed Mandrake 7.1 on several computers at work and everything > worked flawlessly. However, I installed it on my home computer, and > discovered a bug. My primary HD remains readable, but my second HD > (slave drive on the same IDE bus) becomes