On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, OS wrote:
> Thanks for everyones help so far.
>
> How do I modprobe for eth0 !!! eth0 is not a real module is it ? I've tried
> to ascertain what it is modprob'ing but so far I haven't discovered which one
> it is. If 2.2 could find it perhaps a module which is no longer su
Thanks for everyones help so far.
How do I modprobe for eth0 !!! eth0 is not a real module is it ? I've tried
to ascertain what it is modprob'ing but so far I haven't discovered which one
it is. If 2.2 could find it perhaps a module which is no longer supported in
2.4 (I find that hard to beli
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 10:57:56PM +, OS wrote:
>> Could someone tell me how to get NFS, Samba and eth0 working on the new
>> kernel please !
On 7.2rc1, all I did was rpm -i the hackkernel and it all went like it was
supposed to (at least, eth0 and Samba, didn't get to try NFS).
--
And so
Geoffrey Lee a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 10:57:56PM +, OS wrote:
> > Could someone tell me how to get NFS, Samba and eth0 working on the new
> > kernel please !
> >
> > I thought I would try the new kernel-2.4.0-0.7mdk (at work not home). It was
> > exactly as I had found before. I am
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, OS wrote:
> I thought I would try the new kernel-2.4.0-0.7mdk (at work not home). It was
> exactly as I had found before. I am starting to beleive that there is some
> extra configuration required for the above to work with 2.4 kernels. After
> all, such rudimentary things
Yo,
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 10:57:56PM +, OS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone tell me how to get NFS, Samba and eth0 working on the new
> kernel please !
>
> I thought I would try the new kernel-2.4.0-0.7mdk (at work not home). It was
> exactly as I had found before. I am starting to bel
