Re: [Cooker] what am I supposed to be doing with devfs these days?

Will Smith wrote: Le Mercredi 15 Août 2001 09:42, vous avez écrit : I am confused. devfs has been staunchly rejected by the Cooker team in the past. Now devfsd is a requirement of the latest kernels. Are up-to-date Cooker machines supposed to be using devfs[d] or not? If you don't want

Re: [Cooker] what am I supposed to be doing with devfs these days?

Le Vendredi 17 Août 2001 06:29, vous avez écrit : Will Smith wrote: Le Mercredi 15 Août 2001 09:42, vous avez écrit : I am confused. devfs has been staunchly rejected by the Cooker team in the past. Now devfsd is a requirement of the latest kernels. Are up-to-date Cooker machines

Re: [Cooker] what am I supposed to be doing with devfs these days?

Will Smith wrote: Le Vendredi 17 Août 2001 06:29, vous avez écrit : Will Smith wrote: Le Mercredi 15 Août 2001 09:42, vous avez écrit : I am confused. devfs has been staunchly rejected by the Cooker team in the past. Now devfsd is a requirement of the latest kernels. Are up-to-date Cooker

Re: [Cooker] what am I supposed to be doing with devfs these days?

Pixel wrote: Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Or does new kernel mount devfs by default? drakx now add devfs=mount to the kernel cmdline, so even if kernel doesn't do it by default... Is it configurable? Looks like it belongs to drakboot ... Or, if you want to force it,

Re: [Cooker] what am I supposed to be doing with devfs these days?

Borsenkow Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Or does new kernel mount devfs by default? drakx now add devfs=mount to the kernel cmdline, so even if kernel doesn't do it by default...

Re: [Cooker] what am I supposed to be doing with devfs these days?

On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:42:37AM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: I am confused. devfs has been staunchly rejected by the Cooker team in the past. Now devfsd is a requirement of the latest kernels. Are up-to-date Cooker machines supposed to be using devfs[d] or not? Coz of hotplug I

Re: [Cooker] what am I supposed to be doing with devfs these days?

Le Mercredi 15 Août 2001 09:42, vous avez écrit : I am confused. devfs has been staunchly rejected by the Cooker team in the past. Now devfsd is a requirement of the latest kernels. Are up-to-date Cooker machines supposed to be using devfs[d] or not? If you don't want to use DevFS, remove

Re: [Cooker] what am I supposed to be doing with devfs these days?

On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Will Smith wrote: But you're right. I'm thinking about nvidia users, often gamers a little newbie under linux ( people mdk aim to have). They install a mdk 8.1, and after install the nvidia drivers, all is fine. A reboot later : NOTHING because devfs delete the nvidia