On Monday 10 March 2003 08:26 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Greg Meyer wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 March 2003 06:50 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> >
> > I am saying that if the domain is no longer going to be used (it has
> > disappeared from the Official Mandrake web page headers) it could be
> > repurpose
On Monday 10 March 2003 14:26, Buchan Milne wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Greg Meyer wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 March 2003 06:50 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> >
> > I am saying that if the domain is no longer going to be used (it has
> > disappeared from the Official Man
Le Lundi 10 Mars 2003 14:26, El Gringo ( aka Buchan Milne ) a écrit :
> Of course, it would have to be decided which documentation (all, none,
> some?) would be available only to club members. But it could be
> something along the lines that all cooker/bug testing etc docs are free,
> really good
On Monday 10 March 2003 07:04, James Sparenberg wrote:
>
> If it's going to have a wiki which I'm all for I recommend TWiki.. We
> use it internally at my company... Why ... Stability reliability and the
> ability to do skins / private webs. It can do multiple webs within the
> web as well as ha
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 11:45, Robert L Martin wrote:
> Maybe mandrakesoft.com could drop mandrake.org domain name in favor of such
> project ?
>
> or maybe a "gentlemens agreement" to not bother a domain name with the letters
> DRAK
> On Sunday 09 March 2003 06:03 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > Maybe mandrakesoft.com could drop mandrake.org domain name in favor of
> > such project ?
>
> How about the old MandrakeUser.org?
what about
http://www.mandrakeusers.org
it's already an unofficial community site with howtos, Forum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 09 March 2003 19:32, Austin wrote:
> The wiki is cool, but there is something to be said for:
> autonomy
> simple domain name
> official status
>
> Austin
I agree with you on all of those points. The ideal solution would be for
mandrake to
On Monday 10 March 2003 01:00, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Sunday 09 March 2003 06:50 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > Le Lundi 10 Mars 2003 00:29, Greg Meyer a écrit :
> > > On Sunday 09 March 2003 06:03 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > > > Maybe mandrakesoft.com could drop mandrake.org domain name in fa
The wiki is cool, but there is something to be said for:
autonomy
simple domain name
official status
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching Assistant
Department of Chemistry, York University, Toronto
Mandrak
On Monday 10 March 2003 00:03, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> I really think than we (the community) should instead try to build our own
> website, who could act as a reference point for the many documentation
> efforts going on:
> - this howto
Wouldn't be the wiki the best place for it ?
> - the co
On Sunday 09 March 2003 06:50 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Le Lundi 10 Mars 2003 00:29, Greg Meyer a écrit :
> > On Sunday 09 March 2003 06:03 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > > Maybe mandrakesoft.com could drop mandrake.org domain name in favor of
> > > such project ?
> >
> > How about the old Ma
On 2003.03.09 18:50 Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> How about the old MandrakeUser.org?
I really think this is _the_ ultimate documentation source for mandrake, but
in englihs only, which make it useless for non-english speaking newbies.
But very dated.
We just need to
find how to host such a site (firs
Le Lundi 10 Mars 2003 00:29, Greg Meyer a écrit :
> On Sunday 09 March 2003 06:03 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > Maybe mandrakesoft.com could drop mandrake.org domain name in favor of
> > such project ?
>
> How about the old MandrakeUser.org?
I really think this is _the_ ultimate documentation so
On 2003.03.09 18:03 Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Maybe mandrakesoft.com could drop mandrake.org domain name in favor of such
project ?
(at this point, Acton begins to salivate wildly...)
:-)
Austin
--
Austin Acton Hon.B.Sc.
Synthetic Organic Chemist, Teaching Assis
On Sunday 09 March 2003 06:03 pm, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>
> Maybe mandrakesoft.com could drop mandrake.org domain name in favor of such
> project ?
How about the old MandrakeUser.org?
--
Greg
Le Dimanche 9 Mars 2003 23:40, Austin a écrit :
> On 2003.03.09 17:13 Michael Scherer wrote:
> > Hum, and they will deny that plf is in urpmi.setup ?
>
> Urpmi.setup is in contribs, was written by a non-employee, and the binary
> has absolutely no mention of PLF. In fact, removing PLF from the sou
16 matches
Mail list logo
