-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 24 Avril 2002 13:48, vous avez écrit :
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> > One day, I read on this list, perharps, the 8.2ppc will put on mirror as
> > x86. I saw the iso image on mirror but not the full tree. But I know only
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le Mercredi 24 Avril 2002 12:15, vous avez écrit :
> > On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Phil Lavigna wrote:
> > > And I also placed an order for the 2-CD set. Many thanks (and
> > > congratulations) to Stew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 24 Avril 2002 12:15, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Phil Lavigna wrote:
> > And I also placed an order for the 2-CD set. Many thanks (and
> > congratulations) to Stew Benedict and David Baudens. It runs great on my
> > PowerBoo
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Phil Lavigna wrote:
> And I also placed an order for the 2-CD set. Many thanks (and
> congratulations) to Stew Benedict and David Baudens. It runs great on my
> PowerBook.
>
Special thanks to everyone on cooker-ppc for their help in testing!
Stew Benedict
--
Mandrak
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Phil Lavigna wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 April 2002 06:55 pm, Ben Reser wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:52:25PM -0700, Phil Lavigna wrote:
> > > Does anyone have positive experiences viewing DVDs in Mandrake PPC?
> >
> > Not any hollywood type DVDs since they are encrypted
Hi Ben,
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 06:55 pm, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:52:25PM -0700, Phil Lavigna wrote:
> > Does anyone have positive experiences viewing DVDs in Mandrake PPC?
>
> Not any hollywood type DVDs since they are encrypted. As a result of
> the law in the US Mand
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:52:25PM -0700, Phil Lavigna wrote:
> Does anyone have positive experiences viewing DVDs in Mandrake PPC?
Not any hollywood type DVDs since they are encrypted. As a result of
the law in the US Mandrake does not ship anything like decss that would
be required to view t
Hi,
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 06:28 pm, Ben Reser wrote:
> Well in case you haven't seen the info on /., it appears that mplayer is
> GPL now. So it looks like it can be included at least in contrib.
>
> http://mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-dev-eng/2002-April/007161.html
Does anyone have pos
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 06:28:12PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> Well in case you haven't seen the info on /., it appears that mplayer is
> GPL now. So it looks like it can be included at least in contrib.
>
> http://mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-dev-eng/2002-April/007161.html
Ack wrong list. I p
Well in case you haven't seen the info on /., it appears that mplayer is
GPL now. So it looks like it can be included at least in contrib.
http://mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-dev-eng/2002-April/007161.html
--
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org
What difference does it make to
10 matches
Mail list logo