i can't seem to find the rpm for telnet anywhere. i see graphical telnets
but not the plain 'ol telnet. if mandrake dosn't have a telnet rpm for ppc
can i use one from yellowdog? are they compadable? or d/l the src.rpm and
build it?
thanks
mike
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Michael Marcucio wrote:
i can't seem to find the rpm for telnet anywhere. i see graphical telnets
but not the plain 'ol telnet. if mandrake dosn't have a telnet rpm for ppc
can i use one from yellowdog? are they compadable? or d/l the src.rpm and
build it?
thanks
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Stew Benedict wrote:
SB We like to encourage folks to use ssh, but there is a telnet client
SB and server:
Often you no longer use telnet to connect to a telnet server, but as a
simple diagnostic tool to talk to HTTP server and so on.
--
http://www.edlund.org/
From: Stew Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We like to encourage folks to use ssh, but there is a telnet client and
server:
everyone should use ssh but some people still use telnet and it would be
nice to be able to connect to them ;)
[stew@powerbook-cooker base]$ grep telnet rpmslist
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 03:03:27PM -0400, Michael Marcucio wrote:
i can't seem to find the mdk telnet client rpm here:
ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/ppc/Mandrake/RPMS/
Should be there but secsup is always really behind on the mirroring
process.
Here it is
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Michael Marcucio wrote:
From: Stew Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We like to encourage folks to use ssh, but there is a telnet client and
server:
everyone should use ssh but some people still use telnet and it would be
nice to be able to connect to them ;)
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Ben Reser wrote:
BR On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 09:07:58PM +0200, Henrik Edlund wrote:
BR Often you no longer use telnet to connect to a telnet server, but as a
BR simple diagnostic tool to talk to HTTP server and so on.
BR
BR Try HEAD or GET for that. You'll have these if
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Ben Reser wrote:
BR Actually using telnet for that is not the greatest idea. You should
BR use something like netcat (nc) since telnet attempts to negotiate
BR terminal settings and therefore sends a bunch of extraneous info
BR across the line. Most protocols are tollerent
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:00:41AM +0200, Henrik Edlund wrote:
I still use telnet to connect to routers, switches, and so on... :-) Not
all of those manufacturers have begun switching to ssh yet.
Yea unfortunately I have a lot of Cisco equipment that doesn't have
enough flash space to upgrade
