hg: jdk8/tl/hotspot: 22 new changesets

2013-12-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: a3dc98dc4d21 Author:katleman Date: 2013-12-04 23:11 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/hotspot/rev/a3dc98dc4d21 Added tag jdk8-b119 for changeset ce42d815dd21 ! .hgtags Changeset: b6b9a5d4cda0 Author:amurillo Date: 2013-11-29 11:20 -0800 URL: h

hg: jdk8/tl/jaxp: 4 new changesets

2013-12-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: 9b4fac40124d Author:katleman Date: 2013-12-04 23:11 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/9b4fac40124d Added tag jdk8-b119 for changeset 69a930376c70 ! .hgtags Changeset: 64d8b228a72c Author:lana Date: 2013-12-05 10:32 -0800 URL: http://h

hg: jdk8/tl/langtools: 4 new changesets

2013-12-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: 1670108bec25 Author:katleman Date: 2013-12-04 23:11 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/1670108bec25 Added tag jdk8-b119 for changeset 43a80d75d06e ! .hgtags Changeset: b3d7e86a0647 Author:lana Date: 2013-12-05 10:34 -0800 URL: htt

hg: jdk8/tl/nashorn: 4 new changesets

2013-12-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: 7fa32e7d755f Author:katleman Date: 2013-12-04 23:11 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/nashorn/rev/7fa32e7d755f Added tag jdk8-b119 for changeset c3343930c73c ! .hgtags Changeset: 55cbc2d00c93 Author:lana Date: 2013-12-05 10:34 -0800 URL: http:

hg: jdk8/tl/jaxws: 2 new changesets

2013-12-12 Thread lana . steuck
Changeset: 6c152deb600d Author:katleman Date: 2013-12-04 23:11 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxws/rev/6c152deb600d Added tag jdk8-b119 for changeset 172b8e056ff2 ! .hgtags Changeset: 32050ab53c8a Author:katleman Date: 2013-12-12 05:21 -0800 URL: htt

Re: Theoretical data race on java.util.logging.Handler.sealed

2013-12-12 Thread Mandy Chung
Hi Peter, On 12/8/2013 11:19 AM, Peter Levart wrote: H Mandy, I created an issue for it nevertheless: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029781 You're right, doPrivileged() is a more straight-forward approach than 'sealed' variable. Since this might only be considered for inclusion i

hg: jdk8/tl/jaxp: 8029895: XMLOutputFactory.newFactory(String, ClassLoader) - incorrect specification

2013-12-12 Thread huizhe . wang
Changeset: 3e5bf0372a93 Author:joehw Date: 2013-12-12 11:36 -0800 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jaxp/rev/3e5bf0372a93 8029895: XMLOutputFactory.newFactory(String, ClassLoader) - incorrect specification Reviewed-by: alanb, dfuchs, lancea ! src/javax/xml/stream/XMLOutputFa

Review request for 8021368: Launch of Java Web Start app fails with ClassCircularityError exception

2013-12-12 Thread Mandy Chung
JDK-8021368: Launch of Java Web Start app fails with ClassCircularityError exception in 7u25 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8021368 This is a fix for 7u60 only. It's a regression in 7u25 due to JDK-8010117 where it calls Class.getMethod to determine if the checkMemberAccess method i

Re: Conflicts between JVM application and j.u.l logging shutdown hooks

2013-12-12 Thread Laurent Bourgès
Alan, Thanks for creating the bug 9005822 ! As I spotted in my initial email, both shutdown hook problems (JavaWS and JUL) are due to the concurrent execution of shutdown hooks : com.sun.imageio.stream.StreamCloser.java 101: Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook(streamCloser); java.util.logging

Re: RFR: 8027536: rmic: add deprecation warning message

2013-12-12 Thread Stuart Marks
Per Mandy's comment, there's a call to error() but it really just issues a warning and proceeds the processing. I'll change it to output(getText()). But it really should be just a warning. This functionality is deprecated, so for JDK 8 there are disclaimers in docs and warnings issued by tools

Re: RFR: 8027536: rmic: add deprecation warning message

2013-12-12 Thread Stuart Marks
On 12/11/13 2:37 PM, Mandy Chung wrote: The change looks okay. The error(...) method is called to print warnings seems to be confusing. Perhaps better to call output(getText()) directly? Yeah, it's confusing. I'll change it. One other note: AFAIK the last message drop for jdk8 local

Re: RFR: JDK 9: 8024033: [launcher] remove solaris dual mode support

2013-12-12 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Joe, Thanks for the review. Hi Kumar, Will be glad to see this "feature" purged from the sources! I believe the comments on lines 135 to 167 in the new file still need some updating. The comment block on line 261 - 273 may need revising too. Got it, I will fix those. Thanks Kumar Ot