On 06/01/2016 05:28, Chris Hegarty wrote:
sun.misc.MessageUtils provides low-level access for writing “error” messages
to stdout and stderr. It is, effectively, used in just one place in the JDK,
String
coding, when the specific encoding is not available. Since this is the only
usage,
the minim
Just to note that I once needed this and even commented on Stack Overflow
about it:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/166340/write-a-password-protected-zip-file-in-java
I'd just note that setting the password on each entry is a bit painful, as
you'd normally expect to just set the password once.
On 06/01/16 10:12, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 06/01/2016 05:28, Chris Hegarty wrote:
sun.misc.MessageUtils provides low-level access for writing “error”
messages
to stdout and stderr. It is, effectively, used in just one place in
the JDK, String
coding, when the specific encoding is not available. S
Thanks for the patch.
The docs say that if the end date is before the start date, the stream is
empty. While I can see just about why LongStream.range() works that way, I
don't think this API should. The minimum is an exception, but it would be
easy to support negative in the days-only case or the
Hi Sherman,
Thank you for your feedback!
At first, I'd like to confirm your thought about ZipCryption to
prevent misunderstand.
By following reasons, we should remove (or modified) ZipCryption to
not have any "encryption" related field/method in DeflaterOutputStream
/ InflaterInputStream.
1. Fo
Hi Stephen,
Thank you for your note. After discussion about the design, we will
re-implement API. Please check it, and give feedback us when the time
comes :)
Thanks,
Yuji
2016-01-06 19:27 GMT+09:00 Stephen Colebourne :
> Just to note that I once needed this and even commented on Stack Overflow
Roger,
On 05/01/16 21:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 1/5/2016 2:33 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 5 Jan 2016, at 18:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
The follow on work to adding the Cleaner is to replace uses of finalization
with uses of the Cleaner.
For the 'easy' cases in the java.base module, i
Hi Roger,
I was wondering whether URLJarFile::finalize could be simply removed.
The change you are proposing looks strange to me: if this method
remains, then either the method should continue to call close() or
it should call super.finalize(), shouldn't it?
Since this is a sun.net class then m
Hi Chris,
On 1/6/2016 9:39 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Roger,
On 05/01/16 21:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 1/5/2016 2:33 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 5 Jan 2016, at 18:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
The follow on work to adding the Cleaner is to replace uses of
finalization with uses of the Cle
Hi Daniel,
On 1/6/2016 9:52 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Roger,
I was wondering whether URLJarFile::finalize could be simply removed.
The change you are proposing looks strange to me: if this method
remains, then either the method should continue to call close() or
it should call super.finalize(
On 05/01/2016 18:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
The follow on work to adding the Cleaner is to replace uses of
finalization with uses of the Cleaner.
For the 'easy' cases in the java.base module, it is useful to
introduce a private Cleaner for the
java.base module. It is proposed to be held weakly, t
On 06/01/16 14:54, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 1/6/2016 9:39 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Roger,
On 05/01/16 21:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 1/5/2016 2:33 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 5 Jan 2016, at 18:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
The follow on work to adding the Cleaner is to replace us
+1
Mandy
> On Jan 5, 2016, at 9:28 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>
> sun.misc.MessageUtils provides low-level access for writing “error” messages
> to stdout and stderr. It is, effectively, used in just one place in the JDK,
> String
> coding, when the specific encoding is not available. Since this
Hi Alan,
On 1/6/2016 10:32 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 05/01/2016 18:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
The follow on work to adding the Cleaner is to replace uses of
finalization with uses of the Cleaner.
For the 'easy' cases in the java.base module, it is useful to
introduce a private Cleaner for the
j
On 01/05/2016 10:16 PM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Daniel,
webrev updated to revert changes to MeteredStream as too risky.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-cleaning-finalizers/index.html
Hi Roger,
I briefly skimmed over the webrev, and found the following issue in
ProcessImpl:
420
On 1/6/16 5:25 AM, KUBOTA Yuji wrote:
Hi Sherman,
Thank you for your feedback!
At first, I'd like to confirm your thought about ZipCryption to
prevent misunderstand.
By following reasons, we should remove (or modified) ZipCryption to
not have any "encryption" related field/method in DeflaterOut
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the review and catching that.
Will fix.
Roger
On 1/6/2016 2:02 PM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 01/05/2016 10:16 PM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Daniel,
webrev updated to revert changes to MeteredStream as too risky.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-cleaning-finalizers
Please review a few cleanups of the ProcessHandle tests.
- Switch to the jdk.test.lib (from lib/testlibrary )
- Cleanup import statements
- Remove TEST.properties and use explicit @run testng argument in each
test
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-testlibrary-8146574/
Is
Hi guys,
It turns out that much of the world's computers is busy doing UTF-8
decoding, so lots of people have expended much effort to make it
faster. Much of that text is ASCII, so it's definitely worth having
special ASCII-only loops. Like this:
static boolean isAscii1(byte[] bytes) {
fo
Thanks Mandy. Please see inline.
On 1/4/2016 6:50 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Dec 23, 2015, at 2:55 PM, huizhe wang wrote:
Hi,
This is an improvement to the new Catalog API on null handling. At the package
level, a null argument shall result in NPE. However, an exception was made to
the metho
Hello all,
Requesting the community to review a patch which replaces custom bound checking
functionality with calls to methods in java.util.Objects.
The methods affected are CounterMode.crypt() and AESCrypt.encryptBlock(),
AESCrypt.decryptBlock()
Bug id:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse
> On Jan 6, 2016, at 4:11 PM, huizhe wang wrote:
>
>
>>
>> What if “paths” is non-empty but all entries are invalid and no catalog file
>> is read - will it read the system property?
>
> It will not read the system property. The assumption is that the paths
> specified are meant to be used.
22 matches
Mail list logo
