looks good.
On 3/15/16 12:19 PM, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Updated as recommended.
Thanks, Roger
On 3/15/2016 2:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
My only comment is that I would prefer to see "Precision" for the
precision constant and "Zone" for the ZONE constant, as they describe
t
Hi Stephen,
Updated as recommended.
Thanks, Roger
On 3/15/2016 2:52 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
My only comment is that I would prefer to see "Precision" for the
precision constant and "Zone" for the ZONE constant, as they describe
the query better. No need for another webrev.
Otherwi
Hi Stephen,
Updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-format-8085887/
On 3/14/2016 7:45 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Great to see the better error messages. It may be better long term to
add toString() to the TemporalQuery implementations (lambdas are
convenient but optional
After this patch, the version of ASM internally used by OpenJDK will accept V53
class files but not understand module-info.class specific file format,
so that version of ASM will be able to read module-info.class, but will see it
as a class with a bunch of custom attributes and will not be able t
Rémi,
FYI, the new Module attribute is just one of the reasons to bump the
class file version number.
See the list here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2016-January/003507.html
-- Jon
On 03/15/2016 01:41 AM, fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
+1 too,
Upstream, we will wait to implem
Hi Sean,
thank you for the review. Could you sponsor this change?
-Felix
On 2016/3/15 16:03, Seán Coffey wrote:
Please don't use backport IDs in email communication or approval
requests. Use the master bug ID in your changeset commit comment. I've
edited the subject line to include master b
Looks ok.
Roger
On 3/14/2016 8:32 AM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hello,
Any feedback/comments on this?
Thanks,
Jan
On 1.3.2016 11:54, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a review of a patch for JDK-8131913. The fix is to
use the "UnsupportedTerminal", which will not try to switch the OS
t
Hi Dawid,
I will update bug.
Rgds,Rory
On 15/03/2016 12:53, Dawid Weiss wrote:
This must be more complicated than I thought because the same code
passes with flying colors on another (fairly fresh install) of Windows
10... I don't know what the difference is, to be honest (I have
Windows 10 Pr
This must be more complicated than I thought because the same code
passes with flying colors on another (fairly fresh install) of Windows
10... I don't know what the difference is, to be honest (I have
Windows 10 Pro N). I'll try to dig deeper, time permitting, but
perhaps a comment on the eventual
I filed an issue (Review ID: JI-9032181). In any case, I checked with
Java 7, 8 and the ea:
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build
9-ea+109-2016-03-09-181019.javare.4620.nc)
The issue only affects Windows 10 (tested on 64-bit only), Windows 7
behaves fine. The following sequence is enough to get
Hi Dawid,
Can you log a bug and send me the JI, thanks ?
If you have more info you can share it would be useful to follow up on
the nio-dev mailing list.
(http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/nio-dev)
Rgds,Rory
On 15/03/2016 11:28, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 15/03/2016 11:19, Dawid Wei
On 15/03/2016 11:19, Dawid Weiss wrote:
I couldn't find an appropriate bug in bugzilla, but this fails
reliably for me with Java 8 and 9 on Windows 10, 64-bit:
mkdir foo
mklink /J bar foo
cd bar
java -cp Test .
where Test.java is as simple as:
import java.io.*;
import java.nio.file.*;
public
I couldn't find an appropriate bug in bugzilla, but this fails
reliably for me with Java 8 and 9 on Windows 10, 64-bit:
mkdir foo
mklink /J bar foo
cd bar
java -cp Test .
where Test.java is as simple as:
import java.io.*;
import java.nio.file.*;
public class Test {
public static void main(Str
On 15/03/2016 08:41, fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
+1 too,
Upstream, we will wait to implement the module-info file format before bumping
the supported major version.
Do you need to support module-info file soon ?
We going to attempt to bring in the module system in jdk-9+111. The
jdk9/dev -> ma
+1 too,
Upstream, we will wait to implement the module-info file format before bumping
the supported major version.
Do you need to support module-info file soon ?
regards,
Rémi
- Mail original -
> De: "Sundararajan Athijegannathan"
> À: "Kumar Srinivasan" , "Remi Forax"
> , "Jonathan
Please don't use backport IDs in email communication or approval
requests. Use the master bug ID in your changeset commit comment. I've
edited the subject line to include master bug ID (8151352). Approved.
The jtreg upgrade disrupted test results for quite a few teams (again).
https://bugs.ope
16 matches
Mail list logo
