On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Dave Brosius
wrote:
> I would avoid Pair and Entry like the plague. They are devoid of meaning
> and are just there to save your fingers.
The only difference is that the latter is already available in java.util.
And perhaps it is (should be?) more attractive to
On Jul 12, 2017, at 11:52 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 13/07/2017 00:06, Xueming Shen wrote:
>> :
>>
>> My reading of the 1.2.11 changes suggests the root cause is that the internal
>> state "deflate_state.high_water" is not being reset correctly/appropriately
>> (to 0?)
>> in deflateReset/defl
I would avoid Pair and Entry like the plague. They are devoid of meaning
and are just there to save your fingers. If that is your main impetus,
i'd just turn to using lombok and have true bean classes, that are
finger-cost free.
On 07/13/2017 05:41 PM, fo...@univ-mlv.fr wrote:
De: "John Rose
> De: "John Rose"
> À: "Rémi Forax"
> Cc: "joe darcy" , "core-libs-dev"
>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 13 Juillet 2017 23:05:14
> Objet: Re: java.util.Pair
> On Jul 13, 2017, at 1:39 PM, Remi Forax < [ mailto:fo...@univ-mlv.fr |
> fo...@univ-mlv.fr ] > wrote:
>> Tuples are like an array of value types para
On Jul 13, 2017, at 1:39 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
>
> Tuples are like an array of value types parameterized by a constant integer
The homogeneous case is pretty simple; most of what you need is
to allow a generic type to be parameterized by an integer. C++ templates
have had that for a long time.
Tuples are like an array of value types parameterized by a constant integer so
it will be interesting to revisit this issue when we will have a clear idea
about what value types are and how to parameterized a class.
cheers,
Rémi
- Mail original -
> De: "joe darcy"
> À: "Hohensee, Paul"
On Jul 13, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>
> Maybe automatic refactoring to Map.Entry ? With the new static method added
> in 9, creating one is also very fluent (but I
> know that Entry doesn't convey same meaning as Pair in method
> signatures/fields)
The JavaFX Pair Paul is
Similarly, I've used
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/AbstractMap.SimpleEntry.html
and
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/AbstractMap.SimpleImmutableEntry.html
in these circumstances.
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:29 PM Maurizio Cimadamore <
maurizio.cimadam...@orac
Hi All,
FYI: We added a couple of classes in Apache Commons Lang to deal with pairs
and triples. This is definitely for the pragmatic programmer...
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/javadocs/api-release/org/apache/commons/lang3/tuple/Pair.html
https://commons.apache.org/proper/common
Thanks for the immediate response.
Having read the thread, I understand the argument against including Pair in the
JDK and personally agree with the sw engineering argument. But, it got into
javafx.util somehow and is now effectively part of the JDK anyway, so that ship
has sailed. Thus, it see
That’s a possibility. We could recommend that as an alternative.
Thanks,
Paul
On 7/13/17, 10:29 AM, "Maurizio Cimadamore"
wrote:
Maybe automatic refactoring to Map.Entry ? With the new static method
added in 9, creating one is also very fluent (but I know that Entry
doesn't conv
Maybe automatic refactoring to Map.Entry ? With the new static method
added in 9, creating one is also very fluent (but I know that Entry
doesn't convey same meaning as Pair in method signatures/fields)
http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/java/util/Map.html#entry-K-V-
Cheers
Maurizio
Hi Paul,
See the discussion in thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2010-March/003973.html
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2010-April/thread.html
In short, no current plans to add java.util.Pair.
-Joe
On 7/13/2017 10:07 AM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
Random drive-by comments.
- consider adding a link to the JDK bug to the zlib bug.
- configure on linux reports:
--with-zlib use zlib from build system or OpenJDK source
(system, bundled) [bundled]
Does this need updating to "system" ?
See the ancient https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4947273.
At Amazon, many projects depend on JavaFX to get only a single class, namely
javafx.util.Pair. That means that we must distribute OpenJFX along with our
internal OpenJDK distribution, or split javafx.util.Pair out into a separate
Thanks, Lance
-- Jon
On 7/13/17 3:20 AM, Lance Andersen wrote:
looks fine Jon
On Jul 12, 2017, at 10:06 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
mailto:jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com>> wrote:
Please review ...
More noreg-doc API cleanup for accessibility, etc. This time for
java.sql and java.sql.rowset.
One o
Hi Christoph,
Thank you for your help!
Regards,
Ogata
"Langer, Christoph" wrote on 2017/07/13
19:32:32:
> From: "Langer, Christoph"
> To: Kazunori Ogata
> Cc: core-libs-dev , "nio-
> d...@openjdk.java.net"
> Date: 2017/07/13 19:32
> Subject: RE: 8182743: Ineffective use of volatile hurts
Hi Ogata,
I'll take care of backporting a fix to remove the "volatile" qualifier for
both, JDK-8182743 and JDK-8184330.
Best regards
Christoph
> -Original Message-
> From: Kazunori Ogata [mailto:oga...@jp.ibm.com]
> Sent: Freitag, 7. Juli 2017 18:59
> To: core-libs-dev ; nio-
> d...@ope
looks fine Jon
> On Jul 12, 2017, at 10:06 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
> wrote:
>
> Please review ...
>
> More noreg-doc API cleanup for accessibility, etc. This time for java.sql
> and java.sql.rowset.
> One of the tables ought to be restructured a bit, because there is no single
> unique column
java/lang/ClassLoader/deadlock/TestCrossDelegate.sh
java/lang/ClassLoader/deadlock/TestOneWayDelegate.sh
Please review this patch to refactor the shell tests to java.
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8183377
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~amlu/8183377/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Amy
20 matches
Mail list logo
