Hi Michael,
On 4/16/19 4:19 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Michael,
Re-directing to core-libs-dev and hotspot-gc-dev.
Thanks,
David
On 16/04/2019 12:14 pm, Michael Pollmeier wrote:
Quoting
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/ref/SoftReference.html
All sof
Hi Michael,
Re-directing to core-libs-dev and hotspot-gc-dev.
Thanks,
David
On 16/04/2019 12:14 pm, Michael Pollmeier wrote:
Quoting
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/ref/SoftReference.html
All soft references to softly-reachable objects are guaranteed t
Hi Andy,
Looks good.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 4/15/2019 6:32 AM, Andy Herrick wrote:
Please review the jpackage fix for bug [1] at [2].
This is a fix for the JDK-8200758-branch branch of the open sandbox
repository (jpackage).
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222486
[2] http://cr
Please review an update from Xerces in the configuration area. The patch
contains changes not easily measurable with test (e.g. a few bytes for a
parse, or small leaks for a file as large as a GB, or none at all). But
the change does improve in that a method ( readAndBuffer) that
explicitly buf
Hi Lennart,
I can reproduce this locally, and have narrowed down to
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034802 as the cause.
As you say the compression is deferred to ZipFileSystem.close() now,
whereas previously it happened eagerly. We will have to analyze the
changes more in-depth to try
Looks good.
-- Kevin
On 4/15/2019 6:32 AM, Andy Herrick wrote:
Please review the jpackage fix for bug [1] at [2].
This is a fix for the JDK-8200758-branch branch of the open sandbox
repository (jpackage).
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222486
[2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/
On 2019-04-15 15:10, Claes Redestad wrote:
This reduces first-time bootstrap times for the targeted patterns from
~20ms to be lost in the noise on my machine (so ~0.5ms), while being
peak performance neutral and not regressing bootstrap characteristics on
more complex patterns.
Correction: I ac
I have made a small command-line utility which creates zip archives by
compressing the input files in parallel.
I do this by calling Files.copy(input, zipOutputStream) in a parallel Stream
over all input files.
I have run this with Java 1.8, 9, 10, and 11, on both my local laptop and on
server
Please review the jpackage fix for bug [1] at [2].
This is a fix for the JDK-8200758-branch branch of the open sandbox
repository (jpackage).
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222486
[2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8222486/
/Andy
Hi Jim,
thanks for reviewing, and it's fair that we seek to improve comments and
readability of this code while we're at it:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8222484/open.01/
Also fixed so we're starting with the value of initialCoder() rather
than 0L for documentation purposes. Using initi
The StringConcatHelper::valueOf really should be StringConcatHelper::stringOf
to clarify the result. Use here is unlike String::valueOf context where the
result is logically String.
StringConcatHelper::mix comments really should describe the encoding. If does a
lot of handwaving re checking for
Looks fine.
-- Kevin
On 4/14/2019 7:16 AM, Andy Herrick wrote:
Please review the jpackage fix for bug [1] at [2].
This is a fix for the JDK-8200758-branch branch of the open sandbox
repository (jpackage).
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222439
[2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~
Hi Stuart,
Thanks. I intentionally modified the map in remapping functions, just like
those tests in
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/00c0906bf4d1/test/jdk/java/util/Map/FunctionalCMEs.java.
My original tests were: create two threads, modify or perform read-only
operations in each, and
Hi,
please review this enhancement to specialize a few simple and common
String concatenation patterns in the default strategy.
Bug:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222484
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8222484/open.00/
This reduces first-time bootstrap times for the
On 15/04/2019 5:34 pm, Patrick Zhang OS wrote:
Removed it. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~qpzhang/8222334/webrev.03/jdk.changeset
By the way, could you please sponsor to push it once approved? thanks in
advance.
Sure - if the core-libs person who also reviews doesn't volunteer (hint
hint ;-) )
Removed it. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~qpzhang/8222334/webrev.03/jdk.changeset
By the way, could you please sponsor to push it once approved? thanks in
advance.
Regards
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: David Holmes
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 2:33 PM
To: Patrick Zhang OS ; core-li
16 matches
Mail list logo