> but I'd concede it to be "." as a default
On second thoughts I am not sure about that either.
I find it much cleaner to know what was generated by looking in a new
directory rather than
hunting in my current directory, especially for the default app-image
case which will dump
a bunch of
I've been thinking about this.
output is nicely symmetrical with input and in the case of a default
app-image it is more than a single item
and personally I'd much rather it not clutter my working directory and
again you get symmetry with input
which you really want to specify but I'd concede
Hi Alan,
Your suspicion is correct. :)
Thanks for the leads, I'll look into it further.
Currently the policy implementation finds policy url's in system
properties, "java.security.policy" and numbered policy locations with
the prefix "policy.url." if the "java.security.policy" property
On 9/14/19 1:08 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 13/09/2019 21:50, Joe Wang wrote:
:
It can be said that the SAX project, in terms of the API work, was
dead a long time ago. There hasn't been any updates/changes since SAX
2.0.2 released in 2004[1]. SAX is in public domain [2]. Sun/Oracle
Intellij configuration files may appear in directories other than /.idea/.
For example the script suggested by AdoptOpenJDK generates such in the root
directory.
пн, 16 сент. 2019 г., 9:33 Alan Bateman :
>
> I think the .ignore files are maintained on build-dev. Note that .idea
> is already
Hi,
after experimenting with jpackage for creating a msi installer, I would like
to suggest the following improvements:
1. Set the ARPPRODUCTICON property, that controls the icon displayed in
Add/Remove Programs for your application.
Hi Naoto,
Thank you for replying. I understand that this behavior is expected.
I will consider the existing behavior.
Regards,
Masanori Yano
> -Original Message-
> From: naoto.s...@oracle.com [mailto:naoto.s...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2019 5:25 AM
> To: Yano, Masanori
Hello,
The .ignore file is currently in regexp format so new additions should
probably be in that format. I don't object to ignoring .iml files.
/Erik
On 2019-09-15 23:33, Alan Bateman wrote:
I think the .ignore files are maintained on build-dev. Note that .idea
is already excluded and it
On 9/16/2019 6:06 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 16/09/2019 13:56, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
In that case, it may be better to issue any warnings about it being
experimental directly from jpackage instead of relying on the
incubating modules.
Incubating modules are incubating non-final APIs so I
On 16/09/2019 13:56, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
In that case, it may be better to issue any warnings about it being
experimental directly from jpackage instead of relying on the
incubating modules.
Incubating modules are incubating non-final APIs so I don't think it's
the right solution here. I
Hi Goetz,
not a full review, just a small suggestion. In jvm.cpp you could just
access ss->base() instead of ss->as_string() since the internal buffer is
already NULL terminated and result_string does not outlive the stringStream
object. Also it misses including ostream.hpp.
Cheers, Thomas
On
In that case, it may be better to issue any warnings about it being
experimental directly from jpackage instead of relying on the incubating
modules.
-- Kevin
On 9/15/2019 1:05 PM, Andy Herrick wrote:
yes - result of this change is as you suggest, everything shows this
warning, so we will
Hi Brent,
The StackWalker benchmark look good to me.
However I have some doubts about the the logging benchmark.
Is the benchmark run in a single thread? If not then
there doesn't seem any guarantee that each call to publish()
will be immediately followed by a call to reset(), but instead,
if
I think the .ignore files are maintained on build-dev. Note that .idea
is already excluded and it contains the .iml and other workspace files
are created for the IntelliJ project, maybe your setup might be different?
-Alan.
On 15/09/2019 21:22, JARvis PROgrammer wrote:
This is a small
14 matches
Mail list logo
