On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
> _Mailing list message from [Alan Snyder](mailto:javali...@cbfiddle.com) on
> [core-libs-dev](mailto:core-libs-...@mail.openjdk.java.ne
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
I believe that the accompanying JBS issue (JDK-8272137) can be closed. Maybe a
mention of how the discussion in this PR was resolved (wit
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
Ah ok, I see your point. In the case that you want to have something be only
`Streamable`, you can create an interface like this (fixed missing
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
The List and Collection interface was almost directly taken from java.util
(apart from the small feature interfaces, that I extracted from the
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
Also, sorry for my Millennial lack of knowledge of older communication methods,
but if I wanted to reply to a specific thread in a mailing lis
for now, but I agree with @amaembo
that if this conversation is indeed mirrored there, then it shouldn't be a
problem to discuss the proposal here, along with the proposed changes.
I actually worked out a usecase (See:
https://github.com/CC007/InterfaceSegregationDemo), where I partially
reimagined the C
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
I read through [these
posts](http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/2013-June/thread.html#1910)
and while I did se
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 01:07:10 GMT, Brian Goetz wrote:
> I understand what you are proposing. I do not believe Streamable carries its
> weight.
That argument seems subjective. Could you elaborate on that in an objective
manner?
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5050
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
Changed the title, since it seemed to cause confusion.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5050
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 15:13:39 GMT, Brian Goetz wrote:
> I object to this change. These issues were explored in the JSR 335 EG and it
> was agreed that this abstraction did not carry its weight. In any case, it is
> premature to bring a PR for a significant API change that has not been
>
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 00:53:06 GMT, liach
wrote:
> Aren't all iterable implementations effectively streamable if they properly
> implement `spliterator`? And the spliterator implementation can always be
> sequential or parallel, dependent on how you feed it into `StreamSupport`.
Yes indeed,
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
The name of this pull request is a bit wrong, but it had to be the same as the
JBS name.
The interfaces don't make the Iterable have
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
I couldn't think of any, but if there are more places where these interfaces
could be used, please tell me, so I can add them.
---
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:28:23 GMT, CC007
wrote:
> create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
> and Optional
Something seemed to have gone wrong with the jcheck
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5050
create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use them in Collection
and Optional
-
Commit messages:
- 8272137: no CR
- 8272137: create Streamable and ParallelStreamable interface and use in
Collection and Optional
Changes:
15 matches
Mail list logo
