Hey Miroslav,
thanks!
Regards
Hans-Joachim
Quoting Miroslav Kos :
Hi Hajo,
I agree with you, this issue means major loss of functionality. I
already started processing backport to jdk8 and after that will
continue with jdk7.
Thanks
Miran
On 26/05/14 18:50, Hans-Joachim Kliemeck
wrote
Hi Hajo,
I agree with you, this issue means major loss of functionality. I
already started processing backport to jdk8 and after that will continue
with jdk7.
Thanks
Miran
On 26/05/14 18:50, i...@kliemeck.de wrote:
Hey Miroslav,
is this correct that the issue will be fixed on jdk9 only (as
Hey Miroslav,
is this correct that the issue will be fixed on jdk9 only (as stated
on https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043129). Since this is a
major loss of functionality which we encountered too, this should be
fixed with the next jdk 7 release.
Regards
Hajo
Quoting miroslav..
On 05/20/2014 11:07 AM, Miroslav Kos wrote:
Hi Chris,
thanks for pointing - I forgot to add copyright. Will fix.
Thanks.
Regarding jar attachment - this is a slightly modified version of test
as received from customer. If there is any mechanism allowing to use
maven artifact (I am not aware o
Hi Chris,
thanks for pointing - I forgot to add copyright. Will fix.
Regarding jar attachment - this is a slightly modified version of test
as received from customer. If there is any mechanism allowing to use
maven artifact (I am not aware of it) with jprt, it would be definitelly
better solut
Chris Hegarty wrote on 05/19/14 10:27:
> Miran,
>
> The source change looks ok to me. Have you commented out the line adding the
> handler because it may be reinstated, or as a reminder that it was
> deliberately
> omitted?
Either way, the code could probably use a comment to explain why it's
co
Miran,
The source change looks ok to me. Have you commented out the line adding
the handler because it may be reinstated, or as a reminder that it was
deliberately omitted?
The test, at the very minimum, will need a suitable copyright header. I
also wonder if there is any other way of testin
Hi,
this is review request for:
8043129: JAF initialisation in SAAJ clashing with the one in javax.mail
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8043129
WEBREV:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8043129/jaxws.00/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mkos/8043129/jdk.00/ (test)
This solves conflict b
