e"
> To: Adam Farley8
> Cc: core-libs-dev , Roger Riggs
>
> Date: 21/04/2020 18:29
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 8239365: ProcessBuilder/Basic.java test
> modifications for AIX execution
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> I do not have strong emotions, leave it up to you. But did you
t; > So long as it passes when it should pass, and fails only when it should
> > fail, clarity is a "would be nice", but ultimately a secondary priority.
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback. :)
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Adam Farley
> > IBM
; Thanks for your feedback. :)
>
> Best Regards
>
> Adam Farley
> IBM Runtimes
>
>
> "Thomas Stüfe" wrote on 03/03/2020 10:52:10:
>
> > From: "Thomas Stüfe"
> > To: Adam Farley8
> > Cc: core-libs-dev
> > Date: 03/03/20
that much either way.
Thanks for your feedback. :)
Best Regards
Adam Farley
IBM Runtimes
"Thomas Stüfe" wrote on 03/03/2020 10:52:10:
From: "Thomas Stüfe"
To: Adam Farley8
Cc: core-libs-dev
Date: 03/03/2020 10:52
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 8239365: ProcessBuilder/Bas
03/03/2020 10:52:10:
>
> > From: "Thomas Stüfe"
> > To: Adam Farley8
> > Cc: core-libs-dev
> > Date: 03/03/2020 10:52
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 8239365: ProcessBuilder/Basic.java test
> > modifications for AIX execution
> >
> >
Thanks for your feedback. :)
Best Regards
Adam Farley
IBM Runtimes
"Thomas Stüfe" wrote on 03/03/2020 10:52:10:
> From: "Thomas Stüfe"
> To: Adam Farley8
> Cc: core-libs-dev
> Date: 03/03/2020 10:52
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 8239365: ProcessBu
Stüfe"
> To: Adam Farley8
> Cc: core-libs-dev
> Date: 03/03/2020 10:52
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: RFR: 8239365: ProcessBuilder/Basic.java test
> modifications for AIX execution
>
> This is why I always was against handing up the result of strerror
> to the user :)
Hi Adam,
It doesn't look like you saw my comments from 2/21.
Please take another look.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2020-February/064878.html
Roger
On 3/3/20 5:43 AM, Adam Farley8 wrote:
Hi All,
Reviews and sponsor requested for a small test change.
Short version: W
This is why I always was against handing up the result of strerror to the
user :) The same problem we would have when running with different locales.
We should have a platform agnostic string table in the java lib for that
purpose...
As for the test, looks good, but I personally would shorten the
Hi All,
Reviews and sponsor requested for a small test change.
Short version: When an AIX machine has the file set "bos.msg.en_US.rte",
the error messages are not in a form that the test expects, causing
failure.
The simplest option appears to be adding the second potential form of the
messag
10 matches
Mail list logo
