Hi Peter,
Thanks for the analysis and followup.
Yes, I think thesimple check as you propose is the desired clarification.
I agree that the change should not affect any existing code outside the JDK
and does not raise a compatibility issue.
Roger
On 5/4/2015 6:22 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Hi,
I am also happy with this change.
Stephen
On 6 May 2015 at 15:43, Roger Riggs roger.ri...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the analysis and followup.
Yes, I think thesimple check as you propose is the desired clarification.
I agree that the change should not affect any existing code
Cool!
Do we need any CCC approval as this *is* a spec change isn't it?
I haven't done such a thing yet, so please give me some pointers. I also
intend to add a jtreg test that verifies this new behavior.
Regards, Peter
On 05/06/2015 05:06 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
I am also happy with
Hi Peter,
I'll run the CCC side, mostly it follows the similar rationale and
structure as the jira entry.
And the details are in your webrev.
Thanks, Roger
On 5/6/2015 11:43 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
Cool!
Do we need any CCC approval as this *is* a spec change isn't it?
I haven't done such
Hi,
Now that JDK-8074003 is in, I'd like to discuss how to tackle JDK-8079063.
Package-private ZoneOffsetTransition constructor that takes
LocalDateTime transition is invoked from the following 4 places:
1 - the public static factory method:
/**
* Obtains an instance defining a
