Looks good to me too; thanks Stuart,
-Joe
On 07/11/2014 07:05 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
Looks fine.
On Jul 11 2014, at 18:11 , Stuart Marks wrote:
Hi all,
Please review this small patch to fix one of the old RMI tests that has started
failing. This simply removes a couple test cases that use
Looks fine.
On Jul 11 2014, at 18:11 , Stuart Marks wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review this small patch to fix one of the old RMI tests that has
> started failing. This simply removes a couple test cases that use the
> (hidden, unsupported) -Xnew option of rmic, which relies on support for ol
+1
On Jul 11, 2014, at 9:11 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review this small patch to fix one of the old RMI tests that has
> started failing. This simply removes a couple test cases that use the
> (hidden, unsupported) -Xnew option of rmic, which relies on support for old
> -so
Hi all,
Please review this small patch to fix one of the old RMI tests that has started
failing. This simply removes a couple test cases that use the (hidden,
unsupported) -Xnew option of rmic, which relies on support for old -source and
-target values that were recently removed from javac by
