Hi Joe,
Before performing the full investigation, I'm now leaning toward have a
base repo which would host files currently in the jdk, langtools, and
hotspot repos and then another repo for all the other library code
(jaxp, jaxws, corba).
Compared to moving around all the source files in
On 10/15/2014 8:35 AM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hi Joe,
Before performing the full investigation, I'm now leaning toward have
a base repo which would host files currently in the jdk, langtools,
and hotspot repos and then another repo for all the other library code
(jaxp, jaxws, corba).
Something
On 28/08/2014 08:31, Michael Kay wrote:
I haven't yet had a chance to look at the JAXP tests, but this kind of message suggests
to me that they don't separate what is in JAXP (the interface) from what is in Xalan and
Xerces (the implementations).Would that be a correct assumption? The
: Convert JAXP functin tests:
org.xml.sax to jtreg (testNG) tests
On 8/27/2014 4:03 PM, Tristan Yan wrote:
Hi Joe and others
I updated the tests with putting them in jaxp repo. I also run these
tests with security manager and they all passed
http://cr.openjdk.java.net
]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:31 PM
To: Frank Yuan
Cc: huizhe wang; Tristan Yan; Core-Libs-Dev
Subject: Re: Review request for JDK-8051540: Convert JAXP functin tests:
org.xml.sax to jtreg (testNG) tests
I haven't yet had a chance to look at the JAXP tests, but this kind of
message suggests
chain.
Best Regards
Frank
-Original Message-
From: core-libs-dev [mailto:core-libs-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf
Of huizhe wang
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 7:39 AM
To: Tristan Yan
Cc: Core-Libs-Dev
Subject: Re: Review request for JDK-8051540: Convert JAXP functin
On 8/27/2014 4:03 PM, Tristan Yan wrote:
Hi Joe and others
I updated the tests with putting them in jaxp repo. I also run these
tests with security manager and they all passed
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tyan/JDK-8051540/webrev01/
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Etyan/JDK-8051540/webrev01/
-Original Message-
From: core-libs-dev [mailto:core-libs-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf
Of huizhe wang
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 7:39 AM
To: Tristan Yan
Cc: Core-Libs-Dev
Subject: Re: Review request for JDK-8051540: Convert JAXP functin tests:
org.xml.sax to jtreg
-libs-dev [mailto:core-libs-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On
Behalf Of huizhe wang
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 7:39 AM
To: Tristan Yan
Cc: Core-Libs-Dev
Subject: Re: Review request for JDK-8051540: Convert JAXP functin
tests: org.xml.sax to jtreg (testNG) tests
On 8/27/2014 4:03 PM, Tristan
By the way, the plan has been that all of the JAXP SQE and Unit tests be
migrated into [openjdk]/jaxp repo under jaxp/test. Tests currently in
the jdk repo shall be moved to jaxp/test as well. I see that your webrev
was generated in jdk9/dev/jdk. I hope it doesn't mean you're checking
tests
Thanks Joe.
I will move the tests to [openjdk]/jaxp repo then.
Tristan
On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:32 AM, huizhe wang huizhe.w...@oracle.com wrote:
By the way, the plan has been that all of the JAXP SQE and Unit tests be
migrated into [openjdk]/jaxp repo under jaxp/test. Tests currently in the
Hi Joe, Alan and others
We’re working on moving our internal jaxp functional tests to open idk
repo(Include refactoring effort). This is the first open review I am asking for
SAX and Transform. Would you please review these tests. Any comment will be
appreciated.
I put the webrev as follows:
Hi Tristan,
Nice work! As with those converted by Eric (8051561), the new tests
looked much better and cleaner than the original ones.
I see that you're using jaxp.library instead of a base class as in
Eric's previous webrev. Is this the final decision on the whole test
structure? It
Thanks Joe
We intend to replace the base class with test library because that doesn’t look
like a real base class but an utilities class.
I haven’t tried to run these tests with security manager, I will run them with
security manager then get back you soon.
Thank you.
Tristan
On Aug 18, 2014,
14 matches
Mail list logo
