Hi,
Re-posting this for review since I've done another version which
duplicates some of the code in SslRMIServerSocketFactory.java but does
not change API other than adding the new property. I personally don't
like it, but maybe this version is preferred?
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 11:54 +0100, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Updated webrev with jtreg test in Java:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6425769/02/
> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6425769
>
> I believe this updated webrev addresses all concerns and incorpora
Hi,
Updated webrev with jtreg test in Java:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6425769/02/
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6425769
I believe this updated webrev addresses all concerns and incorporates
suggestions brought up by Jaroslav and Daniel.
I'm still looking fo
On 2.11.2015 19:06, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Jaroslav and Daniel for the reviews! Comments inline.
On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 16:54 +0100, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2.11.2015 16:19, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> Hi Severin,
>>
>> Adding serviceability-...@openjdk.java.net into the loop
Hi,
Thanks Jaroslav and Daniel for the reviews! Comments inline.
On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 16:54 +0100, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2.11.2015 16:19, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> > Hi Severin,
> >
> > Adding serviceability-...@openjdk.java.net into the loop - that's
> > a better alias than hotspo
Hi,
On 2.11.2015 16:19, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi Severin,
Adding serviceability-...@openjdk.java.net into the loop - that's
a better alias than hotspot-dev for this kind of changes - maybe
someone from serviceability-dev will offer to sponsor :-)
I will let serviceability team members comment on
