On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
The Release Note for this PR did n
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
Marked as reviewed by jpai (Review
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
Hello Eirik, I'll run this against
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
This PR is daydreaming about a sp
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
Good riddance.
-
PR
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
Marked as reviewed by alanb (Revie
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
The CSR for this PR has been appro
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
The CSR for this PR has now been a
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:36:38 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> I think you should be able to finalize the CSR JDK-8304458.
Thanks for the gentle nudge, Alan.
I was actually not aware that finalization could be initiated by the assignee!
I've seen the CSR lead handle this workflow previously. I presse
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
I think you should be able to fina
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
The CSR for the removal of `java.l
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 01:46:46 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>The only part of that we have left today is that -Djava.compiler=NONE is an
>alias for -Xint mode.
Edit: ... unless `-Xdebug` is specified in which case it is ignored.
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13092#issue
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:35:58 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
> I don't know how much interdependency there is between the java.compiler
> system property and the java.lang.Compiler class.
> On the library side I think they're independent.
That may be true today but originally they were very much inte
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 02:01:38 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>>> The discussion is also a reminder that -Djava.compiler=NONE is the
>>> equivalent of -Xint, I thought that system property was dropped a long time
>>> ago.
>>
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8041676 suggests to deprecate it, but
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
I noticed there are quite a few us
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 15:20:33 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> > The discussion is also a reminder that -Djava.compiler=NONE is the
> > equivalent of -Xint, I thought that system property was dropped a long time
> > ago.
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8041676 suggests to deprecate it, but
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
A search of 3M classes in 130k art
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 15:08:58 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> The discussion is also a reminder that -Djava.compiler=NONE is the equivalent
> of -Xint, I thought that system property was dropped a long time ago.
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8041676 suggests to deprecate it, but from
the las
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 14:38:55 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> For reference, here's the discussion from 2016 when it was proposed to
> deprecate j.l.Compiler, for removal. Tim Ellison from IBM engaged in that
> discussion as one of the replies asked about applications running on the J9
> VM using th
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
For reference, here's the discussi
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:01:26 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
> `java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
> terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
The actual change in this PR seems
Please help review this PR which suggests we remove the class
`java.lang.Compiler`. The class seems non-functional for a decade, and was
terminally deprecated in Java 9. Time has come to let it go.
-
Commit messages:
- Remove the deprecated class java.lang.Compiler
Changes: https:
22 matches
Mail list logo
