On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:23:32 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> Is it not already in CharacterDataLatin1?
>>
>> Here is a comparison of relying on improvements in
>> `CharacterDataLatin1.toUpperCase/toLowerCase` only vs. using
>> `CharacterDataLatin1.equalsIgnoreCase`:
>>
>>
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:16:45 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/CharacterDataLatin1.java.template line
>> 170:
>>
>>> 168: * @return true if the two bytes are considered equals ignoring
>>> case in latin1
>>> 169: */
>>> 170: static boolean
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:40:09 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> Eirik Bjorsnos has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Add @bug tag to EqualsIgnoreCase test for correct issue JDK-8302871
>> - Add @bug tag to EqualsIgnoreCase test
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 14:45:09 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
>> This PR suggests we can speed up `StringLatin1.regionMatchesCI` by applying
>> 'the oldest ASCII trick in the book'.
>>
>> The new static method `CharacterDataLatin1.equalsIgnoreCase` compares two
>> latin1 bytes for equality ignoring
> This PR suggests we can speed up `StringLatin1.regionMatchesCI` by applying
> 'the oldest ASCII trick in the book'.
>
> The new static method `CharacterDataLatin1.equalsIgnoreCase` compares two
> latin1 bytes for equality ignoring case. `StringLatin1.regionMatchesCI` is
> updated to use
