On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:16:45 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/CharacterDataLatin1.java.template line >> 170: >> >>> 168: * @return true if the two bytes are considered equals ignoring >>> case in latin1 >>> 169: */ >>> 170: static boolean equalsIgnoreCase(byte b1, byte b2) { >> >> Perhaps put this in `CharacterDataLatin1`, keeping it close to >> toLowerCase/toUpperCase that you're changing to use similar logic with >> #12623 >> >> If you apply #12623 first - how much difference does this make on the micro >> you're adding with this PR? > > Is it not already in CharacterDataLatin1? > > Here is a comparison of relying on improvements in > `CharacterDataLatin1.toUpperCase/toLowerCase` only vs. using > `CharacterDataLatin1.equalsIgnoreCase`: > > Character.toUpperCase/toLowerCase only: > > > Benchmark (codePoints) (size) Mode Cnt > Score Error Units > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC ascii-match 1024 avgt 15 > 1310.582 ± 84.777 ns/op > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC ascii-mismatch 1024 avgt 15 > 4.547 ± 0.545 ns/op > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC number-match 1024 avgt 15 > 686.947 ± 11.850 ns/op > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC number-mismatch 1024 avgt 15 > 3.836 ± 0.634 ns/op > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC lat1-match 1024 avgt 15 > 2107.219 ± 17.662 ns/op > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC lat1-mismatch 1024 avgt 15 > 4.924 ± 0.829 ns/op > > > CharacterDataLatin1.equalsIgnoreCase: > > > Benchmark (codePoints) (size) Mode Cnt > Score Error Units > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC ascii-match 1024 avgt 15 > 742.467 ± 34.490 ns/op > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC ascii-mismatch 1024 avgt 15 > 3.960 ± 0.046 ns/op > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC number-match 1024 avgt 15 > 361.158 ± 37.096 ns/op > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC number-mismatch 1024 avgt 15 > 4.039 ± 0.521 ns/op > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC lat1-match 1024 avgt 15 > 1158.091 ± 41.617 ns/op > RegionMatchesIC.Latin1.regionMatchesIC lat1-mismatch 1024 avgt 15 > 4.358 ± 0.123 ns/op Oops, I lost context and thought this was in `StringLatin1`. Thanks for running the numbers with #12623. Looks like you're getting big enough of an improvement on top. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12632