On Thu, 4 May 2023 16:19:04 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Classfile API didn't handle transformations of class files version 50 and
>> below correctly.
>>
>> Proposed fix have two parts:
>> 1. Inflation of branch targets does not depend on StackMapTable attribute
>> presence for class file
On Fri, 5 May 2023 02:50:45 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Since we want an option to toggle stackmap generation, will you add it to the
> Classfile options as a temporary measure, before we keep track of these
> options in a stateful object (with hierarchy resolver etc.) like brian
> envisioned?
On Thu, 4 May 2023 16:19:04 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Classfile API didn't handle transformations of class files version 50 and
>> below correctly.
>>
>> Proposed fix have two parts:
>> 1. Inflation of branch targets does not depend on StackMapTable attribute
>> presence for class file
> Classfile API didn't handle transformations of class files version 50 and
> below correctly.
>
> Proposed fix have two parts:
> 1. Inflation of branch targets does not depend on StackMapTable attribute
> presence for class file version 50 and below. Alternative fallback
> implementation is
