On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:46:19 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix comment in autoconf file
>
> make/Images.gmk line 126:
>
>> 124: RL_BUILD_MODULE_NAME :=
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 18:40:36 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> What I mean to convey is that how the directory tree in `images/jdk` looks
> like shouldn't change based on the `--enable-linkable-runtime-image`
> configure flag. That is, there will be a `images/jdk/jmods` folder unless
>
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 18:08:23 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> > Yes we do. The main reason being that the `jdk` image has more to it than
> > just the image. `src.zip`, CDS data, `demo` and so on. We don't want to
> > duplicate that. To us, including the `jmods` folder is something that comes
> >
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:01:10 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Yes we do. The main reason being that the `jdk` image has more to it than
> just the image. `src.zip`, CDS data, `demo` and so on. We don't want to
> duplicate that. To us, including the `jmods` folder is something that comes
> into
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 18:09:36 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> > Wasn't the intention to make "creating a linkable runtime image" a build
> > only decision and make the relevant infrastructure classes build-only
> > artefacts?
>
> Build-only decision means that the linkable runtime image is only
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:29:49 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> > > If `--enable-runtime-link-image` is enabled, the JDK image does not
> > > include the packaged modules.
> >
> >
> > That's not true. Right now `--enable-runtime-link-image` modifies how the
> > `lib/modules` image looks like (adds a
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:53:29 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Wasn't the intention to make "creating a linkable runtime image" a build only
> decision and make the relevant infrastructure classes build-only artefacts?
Build-only decision means that the linkable runtime image is only produced by
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 09:55:15 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > If `--enable-runtime-link-image` is enabled, the JDK image does not include
> > the packaged modules.
>
> That's not true. Right now `--enable-runtime-link-image` modifies how the
> `lib/modules` image looks like (adds a bunch of
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:54:32 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> > The updated patch uses a **build-only** `jlink` plugin, still called
> > `--create-linkable-runtime` which is _a)_ added only at build time with
> > `--add-modules` and _b)_ now generates the diff and prepares the image for
> > runtime
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 21:16:04 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> About the configure options,
>
> ```
> --enable-keep-packaged-modules
> enable keeping of packaged modules in jdk image
> [enabled]
> --enable-runtime-link-image
> enable producing
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:24:57 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this patch which adds a jlink mode to the JDK which doesn't
>> need the packaged modules being present. A.k.a run-time image based jlink.
>> Fundamentally this patch adds an option to use `jlink` even though your JDK
>>
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 20:54:32 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> About the configure options,
>
> ```
> --enable-keep-packaged-modules
> enable keeping of packaged modules in jdk image
> [enabled]
> --enable-runtime-link-image
> enable producing an
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:24:57 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this patch which adds a jlink mode to the JDK which doesn't
>> need the packaged modules being present. A.k.a run-time image based jlink.
>> Fundamentally this patch adds an option to use `jlink` even though your JDK
>>
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:27:47 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix comment in autoconf file
>
> make/Images.gmk line 33:
>
>> 31: include Modules.gmk
>> 32: include Utils.gmk
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:24:57 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this patch which adds a jlink mode to the JDK which doesn't
>> need the packaged modules being present. A.k.a run-time image based jlink.
>> Fundamentally this patch adds an option to use `jlink` even though your JDK
>>
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:24:57 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Please review this patch which adds a jlink mode to the JDK which doesn't
>> need the packaged modules being present. A.k.a run-time image based jlink.
>> Fundamentally this patch adds an option to use `jlink` even though your JDK
>>
> Please review this patch which adds a jlink mode to the JDK which doesn't
> need the packaged modules being present. A.k.a run-time image based jlink.
> Fundamentally this patch adds an option to use `jlink` even though your JDK
> install might not come with the packaged modules (directory
17 matches
Mail list logo
