This PR proposes to improve the language used in the FFM specification. There
is a relatively small number of corrections.
One peculiarity with the English language is the distinction between "that" (to
be used in a restrictive clause) and "which" (to be used in a non-restrictive
clause). Here
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:31:11 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> This PR proposes to improve the language used in the FFM specification. There
> is a relatively small number of corrections.
>
> One peculiarity with the English language is the distinction between "that"
> (to be used in a restrictive clau
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 09:31:11 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> This PR proposes to improve the language used in the FFM specification. There
> is a relatively small number of corrections.
>
> One peculiarity with the English language is the distinction between "that"
> (to be used in a restrictive clau
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 11:23:58 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes to improve the language used in the FFM specification.
>> There is a relatively small number of corrections.
>>
>> One peculiarity with the English language is the distinction between "that"
>> (to be used in a restrictive
> This PR proposes to improve the language used in the FFM specification. There
> is a relatively small number of corrections.
>
> One peculiarity with the English language is the distinction between "that"
> (to be used in a restrictive clause) and "which" (to be used in a
> non-restrictive cl
