On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:41:07 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
>> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
>> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
>> le
> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
> left-over from a more generic plugin design that never came to f
> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
> left-over from a more generic plugin design that never came to f
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:42:59 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
>> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
>> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
>> le
> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
> left-over from a more generic plugin design that never came to f
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:03:34 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
>> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
>> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
>> le
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:03:34 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
>> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
>> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
>> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
>> le
> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
> left-over from a more generic plugin design that never came to f
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 10:55:07 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
> compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
> (the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
> left-o
There's an unused concept of a pluginConfig that is passed into the jlink
compress plugins, however we always pass null here and the code seems broken
(the pluginConfig wouldn't have been stored properly). This seem to be a
left-over from a more generic plugin design that never came to fruition.
10 matches
Mail list logo
