Re: Combiner is optional though it is specified?

2008-07-07 Thread Chris Douglas
ou elaborate on how you reached the conclusion that the output of some maps isn't going through the combiner? Also, what version of hadoop are you using? hadoop-0.18 onwards there aren't guarantees on the number of times a combiner is run... Arun -- View this message in context: h

Re: Combiner is optional though it is specified?

2008-07-06 Thread novice user
? >>>> >>> >>> Can you elaborate on how you reached the conclusion that the output >>> of some maps isn't going through the combiner? >>> >>> Also, what version of hadoop are you using? hadoop-0.18 onwards there >>> aren&#

Re: Combiner is optional though it is specified?

2008-07-03 Thread novice user
>> of some maps isn't going through the combiner? >> >> Also, what version of hadoop are you using? hadoop-0.18 onwards there >> aren't guarantees on the number of times a combiner is run... >> >> Arun >> >>> >>> >>> -- &

Re: Combiner is optional though it is specified?

2008-07-01 Thread novice user
't guarantees on the number of times a combiner is run... > > Arun > >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Combiner-is- >> optional-though-it-is-specified--tp18213887p18213887.html >> Sent from the Hadoop core-user

Re: Combiner is optional though it is specified?

2008-07-01 Thread Arun C Murthy
m/Combiner-is- optional-though-it-is-specified--tp18213887p18213887.html Sent from the Hadoop core-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Combiner is optional though it is specified?

2008-07-01 Thread novice user
data, some of the mapper output is directly reached reducer. I am wondering how can this be possible when I have specified combiner in the job configuration. Can any one please let me know if this thing happens? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Combiner-is-optional-though