If you don't add any member fields, then no, I don't think you need to
change anything.
- Aaron
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:11 PM, dealmaker vin...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the following as my type of my value object. Do I need to
implement
readfields and write functions?
private static
If you can use an existing serializeable type to hold that field (e.g., if
it's an integer, then use IntWritable) then you can just get away with that.
If you are specifying your own class for a key or value class, then yes, the
class must implement readFields() and write().
There's no concept of
I have the following as my type of my value object. Do I need to implement
readfields and write functions?
private static class StringArrayWritable extends ArrayWritable {
private StringArrayWritable (String [] aSString) {
super (aSString);
}
}
Aaron Kimball-3 wrote:
