[core-workflow] Re: IRC vs Slack vs Discord vs Gitter

2018-03-31 Thread INADA Naoki
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 1:25 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: > Speaking to my own experience, I have never gotten involved in IRC because I > don't want to have pay for a reflector to know who mentioned me, I don't > want to maintain a server just to have a reflector for free, and I don't > want or have a

[core-workflow] Re: IRC vs Slack vs Discord vs Gitter

2018-03-31 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:25:34 + Brett Cannon wrote: > > Consider the fact that a standard answer to a lack of email threading on > any of the major email providers is to use gmane's NNTP gateway. The main problem with gmane is that it isn't really maintained anymore. In particular you can't

[core-workflow] Re: IRC vs Slack vs Discord vs Gitter

2018-03-31 Thread Brett Cannon
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 02:42 Antoine Pitrou, wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:25:34 + > Brett Cannon wrote: > > > > Consider the fact that a standard answer to a lack of email threading on > > any of the major email providers is to use gmane's NNTP gateway. > > The main problem with gmane is t

[core-workflow] Re: IRC vs Slack vs Discord vs Gitter

2018-03-31 Thread Ned Deily
On Mar 31, 2018, at 05:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > [...] > The main problem with gmane is that it isn't really maintained > anymore. In particular you can't register new mailing-lists to the > gateway :-( Although the old web interface is pining, you can ask for new groups or updates by posting

[core-workflow] Re: IRC vs Slack vs Discord vs Gitter

2018-03-31 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:32:36 -0400 Ned Deily wrote: > On Mar 31, 2018, at 05:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > [...] > > The main problem with gmane is that it isn't really maintained > > anymore. In particular you can't register new mailing-lists to the > > gateway :-( > > Although the old web i

[core-workflow] Re: IRC vs Slack vs Discord vs Gitter

2018-03-31 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > I've also got confirmation from Tim Abbott (ZulipChat cofounder) that > they'd be happy to host us and would even prioritize features they want. > > Who's interested in making this happen?We should start with an experiment, > and it would

[core-workflow] Re: IRC vs Slack vs Discord vs Gitter

2018-03-31 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
Thanks for the writeup Craig! My comments: > - decide on the type of logins/auth that will be allowed for this service >-> GitHub oauth? >-> Google oauth? I'll be happy as long as these two auths are supported. - should there be a DNS name for this for easy eaccess: chat.py

[core-workflow] Re: IRC vs Slack vs Discord vs Gitter

2018-03-31 Thread Brett Cannon
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 at 12:51 Mariatta Wijaya wrote: > Thanks for the writeup Craig! > My comments: > > >> - decide on the type of logins/auth that will be allowed for this service >>-> GitHub oauth? >>-> Google oauth? > > > I'll be happy as long as these two auths are supported. >

[core-workflow] Re: IRC vs Slack vs Discord vs Gitter

2018-03-31 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 31 March 2018 at 06:23, Guido van Rossum wrote: > I've also got confirmation from Tim Abbott (ZulipChat cofounder) that they'd > be happy to host us and would even prioritize features they want. Cool - I've mainly been exposed to the Zulip community via Sumana (who's handling project managemen

[core-workflow] Re: IRC vs Slack vs Discord vs Gitter

2018-03-31 Thread Guido van Rossum
I would love to see this, and I would love it if I didn't have to do anything about it myself except joining the service when it's ready (preferably without having to create a new account :-). On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 9:25 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 31 March 2018 at 06:23, Guido van Rossum wro