On 20-11-13 07:11, mrnuke wrote:
On 11/18/2013 08:36 AM, Patrick Georgi wrote:
For someone trying to pull this off, a good first step might be to
inquire with vendors if they have long term supported AMD models, what
long term means for them, and how to identify these models.
Then, when the
Am Mittwoch, den 20.11.2013, 00:11 -0600 schrieb mrnuke:
Guys! Stop this nonsense. It didn't work in the past, it doesn't work
now, and it won't work in the future. Once you buy that laptop,
Phoenix/AMI/etc gets their money, Microsoft gets their money, Norton
gets their money... you get the
I vote for this!..
I for one, I will be ready to burn even more than 1k€, to get an AMD based
chromebook.
On the other hand we should be realistic : what if Google has agreements with
Intel, forbiding them to even consider the use of AMD chipsets?..
Florentin
- Mail d'origine -
De:
On 11/20/2013 03:29 AM, Patrick Georgi wrote:
Microsoft money gets returned (even if it's just $30).
Norton paid money to get installed (it's a 30 days demo for a reason).
You won't get around the IBV fees with this model, I grant that.
How exactly do you get the software fees back without
On 11/20/2013 03:39 AM, eche...@free.fr wrote:
I vote for this!..
I for one, I will be ready to burn even more than 1k€, to get an AMD based
chromebook.
On the other hand we should be realistic : what if Google has agreements with
Intel, forbiding them to even consider the use of AMD
On 11/20/2013 03:19 AM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
What happened to decline the EULA and demand your money back? Nobody
does that anymore?
Did YOU ever do it?
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
- Mail d'origine -
De: mrnuke mr.nuke...@gmail.com
À: coreboot@coreboot.org
Envoyé: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:47:56 +0100 (CET)
Objet: Re: [coreboot] Re : Re: BadBIOS Thoughts
...
Intel vs Google. Remember, Google has enough cash to buy Intel.
...
Huh?!..
--
coreboot mailing list:
On 20/11/13 09:47, mrnuke wrote:
Intel got nailed pretty hard a couple of years for this. There are laws
against this in both the US and Europe. And then you're talking about
Intel vs Google. Remember, Google has enough cash to buy Intel.
Alex
Perhaps if Google really do care about openness
Hello everyone!
I have compilation problem
If build with gcc
$ make
GENbuild.h
CC romstage.inc
src/mainboard/gigabyte/ma785gmt/romstage.c: In function 'cache_as_ram_main':
src/mainboard/gigabyte/ma785gmt/romstage.c:220:1: error: bp cannot be
used in asm here
}
^
On 20-11-13 10:48, mrnuke wrote:
On 11/20/2013 03:19 AM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
What happened to decline the EULA and demand your money back? Nobody
does that anymore?
Did YOU ever do it?
I haven't bought (nor used at home) a windows license in well over
20? ... never. The only license
Am 20.11.2013 15:33, schrieb Tcendrovskii Vladislav:
src/mainboard/gigabyte/ma785gmt/romstage.c:220:1: error: bp cannot be
used in asm here
I've tried gcc-4.4, gcc-4.8
This is a known issue with gcc-4.8 and 4.9. 4.4 should work - or at
least present a different issue, but certainly not this
Watching this discussion is like watching a puppy chase its tail :-)
Minus the fact that we've seen this discussion before, and we've seen
it go nowhere before, just as it is now :-(
Except that it's spiraling around the drain even faster than usual :-(
I understand people do not find the
TL;DR: Coreboot applied to the Conservancy and has been offered
membership. The FSA template should be reviewed by all interested
parties, and we need your help to draft three specific sections,
which are discussed in detail at the bottom of this email.
Full Details:
I am
Patrick Georgi wrote:
Am 20.11.2013 15:33, schrieb Tcendrovskii Vladislav:
src/mainboard/gigabyte/ma785gmt/romstage.c:220:1: error: bp cannot be
used in asm here
I've tried gcc-4.4, gcc-4.8
This is a known issue with gcc-4.8 and 4.9. 4.4 should work - or at
least present a different issue,
We should give Intel come credit. They're trying to do the right thing
in a way they feel is compatible with their business. You've seen the
FSP commits from Sage in the last few days. That work was only
possible because Intel helped.
ron
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
Am 20.11.2013 17:59, schrieb Tcendrovskii Vladislav:
OPTION option_table.h
/bin/sh: --version: команда не найдена
/bin/sh: --version: команда не найдена
/bin/sh: --version: команда не найдена
GEN build.h
CC romstage.inc
make: MMD: Команда не найдена
POST romstage.inc
sed: невозможно прочитать
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:08:43PM +, Moore, Robert wrote:
We've made some recent changes in this area. Please try iasl version 20131115.
Thanks,
Bob
I tried with latest git:
commit 176efde76486dc037bb34345685d060c97bdd0d3
Author: Robert Moore robert.mo...@intel.com
Date: Fri Nov 15
We've made some recent changes in this area. Please try iasl version 20131115.
Thanks,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:59 AM
To: Moore, Robert
Cc: Kevin O'Connor; Idwer Vollering; seab...@seabios.org;
There's no machine, it's just SSDT and DSDT that I wrote.
Is there not enough information in the data I sent?
Something's unclear?
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:25:39PM +, Moore, Robert wrote:
If there are still issues, please send the acpidump for the machine.
-Original Message-
If there are still issues, please send the acpidump for the machine.
-Original Message-
From: Moore, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:09 AM
To: 'Michael S. Tsirkin'
Cc: Kevin O'Connor; Idwer Vollering; seab...@seabios.org; Tang, Feng;
coreboot@coreboot.org
Subject: Re:
OK, can you just send the files?
thanks
-Original Message-
From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:32 AM
To: Moore, Robert
Cc: Kevin O'Connor; Idwer Vollering; seab...@seabios.org; Tang, Feng;
coreboot@coreboot.org
Subject: Re: iasl
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:38:53PM +, Moore, Robert wrote:
OK, can you just send the files?
thanks
Here goes (3 files attached).
Just run the commands in README to see the problem:
iasl dsdt.dsl
iasl ssdt.dsl
iasl -e DSDT.aml SSDT.aml
iasl SSDT.dsl
#above fails to compile
iasl dsdt.dsl
Ping. any news?
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 06:19:20AM +, Moore, Robert wrote:
I am out this week, will take a look when I get back.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 12:18 AM
To: Moore, Robert
Cc: Kevin
OK, I'm able to see the problem. I'll take a look today.
-Original Message-
From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:09 AM
To: Moore, Robert
Cc: Kevin O'Connor; Idwer Vollering; seab...@seabios.org; Tang, Feng;
coreboot@coreboot.org
On 11/20/2013 09:23 AM, ron minnich wrote:
I've got a student coming in January and he's going to work on
ChromeOS on AMD CPUs, starting with the Gizmo. If, at that time,
someone has a suggestion for an AMD laptop which might be suitable,
let me know.
Would you care to elaborate on that?
As
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:25:39PM +, Moore, Robert wrote:
If there are still issues, please send the acpidump for the machine.
Maybe you want SSDT.dsl and DSDT.dsl as attachments and not inline?
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
On 11/20/2013 08:57 AM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
On 20-11-13 10:48, mrnuke wrote:
On 11/20/2013 03:19 AM, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
What happened to decline the EULA and demand your money back? Nobody
does that anymore?
Did YOU ever do it?
I haven't bought (nor used at home) a windows
Yes, I got the files.
-Original Message-
From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:33 AM
To: Moore, Robert
Cc: Kevin O'Connor; Idwer Vollering; seab...@seabios.org; Tang, Feng;
coreboot@coreboot.org
Subject: Re: iasl
Version GCC 4.7.3 working OK on oldstable Debian 6.0.5 with make crossgcc.attachment: make_crossgcc_debian_6.0.5.png--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
Am 20.11.2013 18:17 schrieb ron minnich:
We should give Intel come credit. They're trying to do the right thing
in a way they feel is compatible with their business. You've seen the
FSP commits from Sage in the last few days. That work was only
possible because Intel helped.
Agreed.
However,
On 11/20/2013 11:17 AM, ron minnich wrote:
We should give Intel come credit. They're trying to do the *profitable* thing
*for* their business.
There, I fixed it for you.
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
It appears that a missing (unresolved) target for a Scope operator does not
cause the generation of an External() declaration in the disassembly. In other
words, the support simply does not exist. I'm still investigating the fix.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
We, the coreboot community, and those passionate about Free and Open
Source Software are passionate about more than just openess in software,
but also openess in hardware. We view the Chromebooks as a step in the
direction we've worked for over a decade to take. We would like to see a
chromebook
Patrick Georgi wrote:
Am 20.11.2013 17:59, schrieb Tcendrovskii Vladislav:
OPTION option_table.h
/bin/sh: --version: команда не найдена
/bin/sh: --version: команда не найдена
/bin/sh: --version: команда не найдена
GEN build.h
CC romstage.inc
make: MMD: Команда не найдена
POST romstage.inc
sed:
The support exists, but is not working properly in this case.
-Original Message-
From: Moore, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:14 PM
To: 'Michael S. Tsirkin'
Cc: Kevin O'Connor; Idwer Vollering; seab...@seabios.org; Tang, Feng;
coreboot@coreboot.org; Zheng, Lv; Box,
http://www.fastcolabs.com/3021652/an-open-source-phone-thats-completely-unlocked-hardware-too
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
Alex, you are of course free to submit such a petition. And, anyone
who wishes can sign it.
I've received an off-list request from one of our other enthusiasts
(i.e. not a company or from a company) to remind you that you are not
in a position to speak for the coreboot community. Possibly you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Any further updates on Intel contributions to the source tree
regarding the sandybridge arch. particularly the C600 chip-set for the
current Dual Xeon boards.
Seen as Supermicro mainly has the monopoly on these type of high end
boards now coreboot
On 11/20/2013 10:13 PM, ron minnich wrote:
Alex, you are of course free to submit such a petition. And, anyone
who wishes can sign it.
I've received an off-list request from one of our other enthusiasts
(i.e. not a company or from a company) to remind you that you are not
in a position to
39 matches
Mail list logo
