Re: [coreboot] M50FW080 replacement

2008-09-17 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
have a look at the sst website. SST49LF080 SST49LF008 cheers, 2008/9/16 Joseph Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello, > I have someone that is looking for a good replacement for the ST M50FW080. > Looks like ST is not manufacturing them any more. The requirements for this > replacement needs to b

Re: [coreboot] AMD RS690 TMDS

2009-08-17 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
hi, i have a m2a-vm hdmi and could provide dumps if needed. just tell me exactly what you need. best regards khn 2009/8/17 Carl-Daniel Hailfinger : > Hi Daniel, > > On 11.08.2009 18:32, Daniel Toussaint wrote: >> I am using the open source drivers , radeon and radeonhd. When I try it on a >> si

Re: [coreboot] intel atom + us15

2011-03-16 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
Hi, i think the following patch should do the trick: --- Index: src/southbridge/intel/sch/Makefile.inc === --- src/southbridge/intel/sch/Makefile.inc (Revision 6439) +++ src/southbridge/intel/sch/Makefile.inc (Arbeitskopie)

Re: [coreboot] Getting started with Coreboot on Intel Core

2010-03-08 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
Hi, i should append: this is using a spi flash with 2 Megs and todays svn version. i also tried with a 1 meg fhw with a somewhat earlier version of coreboot. same problem. regards, karl 2010/3/8 Karl-Heinz Nirschl : > Hi there, > > i'm new to coreboot and trying to port coreb

[coreboot] Getting started with Coreboot on Intel Core

2010-03-08 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
Hi there, i'm new to coreboot and trying to port coreboot to a intel core based board. it's a u2500 with a ich7m and 945gm. i started with kontron 986lcd-m which should be quite similar but didn't have much success so far. the board hangs with post code 0x23 (pci post card) which is bevor "call

[coreboot] Fwd: Getting started with Coreboot on Intel Core

2010-03-08 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
argl, forward this to coreboot list too. -- Forwarded message -- From: Karl-Heinz Nirschl Date: 2010/3/8 Subject: Re: [coreboot] Getting started with Coreboot on Intel Core To: Stefan Reinauer Hi, thanks for your reply. i thought src/northbridge/intel/i945/early_init.c is

[coreboot] crossgcc patch

2010-03-08 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
hi, appended is a simple patch to make crossgcc script work. version number of MPFR was bumped. regards, khn patch Description: Binary data -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

[coreboot] xcompile

2010-03-08 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
Hi, looks to me like xcompile uses the wrong start directory when called from makefile. the appended trivial patch fixes this. regards, patch Description: Binary data -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] crossgcc patch

2010-03-09 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
hi, looks like i was in the old tree. works fine with lastest svn. sorry for that. regards, khn 2010/3/8 Karl-Heinz Nirschl : > hi, > > appended is a simple patch to make crossgcc script work. version > number of MPFR was bumped. > > > regards, > > > khn > --

Re: [coreboot] xcompile

2010-03-09 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
Hi, right. that was the failure. sorry for that. regards, khn 2010/3/9 Stefan Reinauer : > On 3/8/10 11:02 PM, Karl-Heinz Nirschl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> looks to me like xcompile uses the wrong start directory when called >> from makefile. the appended trivial patch fix

Re: [coreboot] Getting started with Coreboot on Intel Core

2010-03-09 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
Hi, no i use crossgcc which looks fine, but still can't hang with postcode 0x23. if have the following in crt0.disasm: 153 0148 B023E680 post_code(0x23) 154 155 014c E8FC callstage1_main 155 FF and the following in romstage.inc (both

Re: [coreboot] Getting started with Coreboot on Intel Core

2010-03-12 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
Hi, i still haven't found whats wrong. toolchain seems to be ok, as everything works fine with qemu. could someone confirm that kontron 986lcd-m is working in the current svn version? regards, karl 2010/3/9 Karl-Heinz Nirschl : > Hi, > > no i use crossgcc which looks fine, b

[coreboot] Coreboot Haswell Support

2013-09-16 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
Hi List, There seems to be some support for intel haswell platform in coreboot. But i can not find the neccessary systemagent / mrb.bin binary. Isnt it released yet? Best regards, -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Re: [coreboot] Coreboot Haswell Support

2013-09-23 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
me you should be “intel inside” to be capable to think “out > of the box”.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* coreboot-boun...@coreboot.org [mailto: > coreboot-boun...@coreboot.org] *On Behalf Of *Karl-Heinz Nirschl > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 11, 2013 11:37 AM > *To:* coreboot@coreboo

Re: [coreboot] latest baytrail fsp on CRB

2014-06-20 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
hi, i did some experiments with the baytrail fsp coreboot and first of all i like to say thanks for all the good code! everything looks much better than the last time i tried to do anything with coreboot. for the problems - maybe there is something wrong with reading the ids. i found that on my p

Re: [coreboot] Improvement of coreboot code (was: latest baytrail fsp on CRB)

2014-06-21 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
reference boards actively supported makes starting much easier. last time it was hard to find a supported mainboard that could be bought somewhere. best regards, karl. 2014-06-21 10:00 GMT+02:00 Paul Menzel : > Dear Karl-Heinz, > > > Am Freitag, den 20.06.2014, 21:17 +0200 schr

Re: [coreboot] Improvement of coreboot code (was: latest baytrail fsp on CRB)

2014-06-21 Thread Karl-Heinz Nirschl
But anyway - the real statement of the message meant to be: "thanks for all the good code". 2014-06-21 10:00 GMT+02:00 Paul Menzel : > Dear Karl-Heinz, > > > Am Freitag, den 20.06.2014, 21:17 +0200 schrieb Karl-Heinz Nirschl: > > > i did some experiments with the