nks to you all.
>
>
> Zheng
>
>
> --
> *From:* Kyösti Mälkki
> *Sent:* Friday, January 13, 2017 4:58 PM
> *To:* Zheng Bao
> *Cc:* Predrag Vidic; coreboot@coreboot.org; Zoran Stojsavljevic
> *Subject:* Re: [coreboot] Question about PCIe sep
crystal part and PCB layout, right?
Kyösti
From: Predrag Vidic mailto:pvi...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 10:29 AM
To: Zheng Bao
Cc: Zoran Stojsavljevic; coreboot@coreboot.org<mailto:coreboot@coreboot.org>
Subject: Re: [coreboot] Question a
--
> *From:* Predrag Vidic
> *Sent:* Friday, January 13, 2017 10:29 AM
>
> *To:* Zheng Bao
> *Cc:* Zoran Stojsavljevic; coreboot@coreboot.org
> *Subject:* Re: [coreboot] Question about PCIe separate reference clock
>
> Hi Zheng,
>
> Schematic is
Does it mean the "on mainboard" side it does not support "Asynchronous clock
mode"?
Zheng
From: Predrag Vidic
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 10:29 AM
To: Zheng Bao
Cc: Zoran Stojsavljevic; coreboot@coreboot.org
Subject: Re: [core
ojsavljevic; coreboot@coreboot.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [coreboot] Question about PCIe separate reference clock
>
> Hi Zheng,
>
> Without knowing the particular solution for the PCIe transmitter you have
> on your board, I'd check refclk pins on your design for the pro
, 2017 9:22 AM
To: Zheng Bao; Predrag Vidic
Cc: coreboot@coreboot.org<mailto:coreboot@coreboot.org>
Subject: Re: [coreboot] Question about PCIe separate reference clock
Hello Zheng,
For decades, I've been FW/SW engineer, but I do understand a little
bit of a HW. I have looked into t
rom:* Zoran Stojsavljevic
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:22 AM
> *To:* Zheng Bao; Predrag Vidic
> *Cc:* coreboot@coreboot.org
> *Subject:* Re: [coreboot] Question about PCIe separate reference clock
>
> Hello Zheng,
>
> For decades, I've been FW/SW engineer, but I d
board meet this requirement. So we doubt the problem
> lies in PCI configration space.
>
>
> Zheng
>
>
>
> From: Zoran Stojsavljevic
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 9:22 AM
> To: Zheng Bao; Predrag Vidic
> Cc: coreboot@coreboot.org
> Subject: Re: [co
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Zheng Bao wrote:
> Our VPX design uses separate reference clock source, which is Si52111-B5
> (No spread), instead of common ref clock from CPU.
>
> Now The system is unstable. Reading PCIE configuration space is unstable
> too. (If we add some fly wire to make it
about PCIe separate reference clock
Hello Zheng,
For decades, I've been FW/SW engineer, but I do understand a little
bit of a HW. I have looked into the Si52111-B5 data sheet for
clarification.
My problem here is to understand, your use case: do you use local xtal
attached to Si52111-
Hello Zheng,
For decades, I've been FW/SW engineer, but I do understand a little
bit of a HW. I have looked into the Si52111-B5 data sheet for
clarification.
My problem here is to understand, your use case: do you use local xtal
attached to Si52111-B5 to generate local PCIe 25MHz clock? If you
Our VPX design uses separate reference clock source, which is Si52111-B5 (No
spread), instead of common ref clock from CPU.
Now The system is unstable. Reading PCIE configuration space is unstable too.
(If we add some fly wire to make it work with common ref clock, the system
becomes stable.)
(
12 matches
Mail list logo