Hi,
On 19.01.22 14:27, Jeff Daly wrote:
> Intel continues to support inclusion of support for Denverton in coreboot,
> but there will be a shift in day to day maintenance is all rather than the
> maintenance being completely internal.
AFAICT, this doesn't mean it will shift but it may start.
was
taken, for that I sincerely apologize.
-Original Message-
From: Szafranski, MariuszX
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2022 4:49 AM
To: Peter Stuge ; coreboot@coreboot.org; Jeff Daly
Subject: RE: [coreboot] Re: Gerrit shows a Merge Conflict (was: Re:
Denverton-NS refactoring)
Caution
@coreboot.org; Daly, Jeff
Subject: [coreboot] Re: Gerrit shows a Merge Conflict (was: Re: Denverton-NS
refactoring)
Hi,
To clarify situation (Jeff - looks like you got wrong my last email )
DNV will still be supported by Intel. Vanessa will continue to be primary
support contact from Intel side
a Merge Conflict (was: Re: Denverton-NS
refactoring)
Thank you for your updates, Jeff.
Jeff Daly wrote:
> the feedback I got from Intel is that they will be moving away from
> internal support for DNV coreboot.
It's sad and telling to see one of the most ambitious technology companies in
the
Thank you for your updates, Jeff.
Jeff Daly wrote:
> the feedback I got from Intel is that they will be moving away from
> internal support for DNV coreboot.
It's sad and telling to see one of the most ambitious technology
companies in the world, one that routinely pushed technology limits,
, January 12, 2022 1:04 PM
To: Nico Huber ; Paul Menzel ;
coreboot@coreboot.org
Subject: RE: [coreboot] Re: Gerrit shows a Merge Conflict (was: Re:
Denverton-NS refactoring)
Ah right. Too many changes to keep track of in my head. I guess that's what
good tools are for. In any case, as long
4 PM
> To: Jeff Daly ; Paul Menzel ;
> coreboot@coreboot.org
> Subject: Re: [coreboot] Re: Gerrit shows a Merge Conflict (was: Re:
> Denverton-NS refactoring)
>
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
> opening attachments.
>
On 12.01.22 16:21, Jeff Daly wrote:
> Ok that sort of makes sense, but for example in the case of the XHCI patch,
> the merge conflict appears to be that since soc/intel/denverton_ns/xhci.c was
> changed completely to reflect the usage of the common code and shouldn't
> cause an issue with
erent.
Nico
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nico Huber
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 12:04 PM
> To: Jeff Daly ; Paul Menzel
> ; coreboot@coreboot.org
> Subject: Re: [coreboot] Re: Gerrit shows a Merge Conflict (was: Re:
> Denverton-NS refactoring)
&
;
coreboot@coreboot.org
Subject: Re: [coreboot] Re: Gerrit shows a Merge Conflict (was: Re:
Denverton-NS refactoring)
Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
opening attachments.
On 12.01.22 16:21, Jeff Daly wrote:
> Ok that sort of makes sense, but for exam
: Paul Menzel
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 10:06 AM
To: coreboot@coreboot.org
Subject: [coreboot] Gerrit shows a Merge Conflict (was: Re: Denverton-NS
refactoring)
Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or
opening attachments.
Dear Jeff,
Am 12.01.22 um 15
11 matches
Mail list logo
