On 19.01.2008 07:35, ron minnich wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008 4:27 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this same situation as before or is it worse? If it is worse, please
try to fix before you commit.
The fix is going to be a bit harder, so I am committing this now.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:19:11PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
I am thinking of something like this:
id=pci,somevendorname,somedevicename;
Makes sense if the coreboot code itself does not have to perform
any string parsing.
Small thing; I would prefer something else than a comma
On Jan 22, 2008 10:46 AM, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Small thing; I would prefer something else than a comma after the
type, so that it is separated from the real information. Maybe:
id=pci:vendor,device;
I think that would make the syntax much more clear.
Thats fine with me, it
On 19/01/08 22:21 -0800, ron minnich wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 5:37 PM, Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't. coreboot is not about the VSA, its not about VGA blobs
or NIC blobs or Bob's random blob. Its about the core boot code. If
it takes an extra step to build the final
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 19.01.2008 07:39, ron minnich wrote:
Marc, should we modify the LX build to somehow wget the VSA and copy
it in to LAR? Or should we have a top-level blob directory in v3
that includes the vsa file, and then build it in to LAR?
Please don't store
On 19.01.2008 18:07, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 19.01.2008 07:39, ron minnich wrote:
Marc, should we modify the LX build to somehow wget the VSA and copy
it in to LAR? Or should we have a top-level blob directory in v3
that includes the vsa file, and then build
On Jan 19, 2008 9:48 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly does stop us from using stage 2 phase 1 for that purpose?
nothing. I will do that.
I will use the coreboot repo for the blob.
Thanks all, you cleared up my thinking.
ron
--
coreboot mailing list
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 08:55:44AM -0800, ron minnich wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 8:18 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19.01.2008 07:39, ron minnich wrote:
Marc, should we modify the LX build to somehow wget the VSA and copy
it in to LAR? Or should we have a top-level
On 19/01/08 08:55 -0800, ron minnich wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008 8:18 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19.01.2008 07:39, ron minnich wrote:
Marc, should we modify the LX build to somehow wget the VSA and copy
it in to LAR? Or should we have a top-level blob directory in
On Jan 19, 2008 5:37 PM, Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't. coreboot is not about the VSA, its not about VGA blobs
or NIC blobs or Bob's random blob. Its about the core boot code. If
it takes an extra step to build the final rom, well, so be it. Write
a script or use an
[Sorry for the almost-fullquote.]
On 18.01.2008 19:24, ron minnich wrote:
With the as-yet uncommitted patch I just posted, we're getting much
better results. My comments in [[[]]]
LinuxBIOS-3.0.0 Fri Jan 18 08:34:27 PST 2008 starting...
Choosing fallback boot.
LAR: Attempting to open
ron minnich wrote:
[[[ here comes the bad news ]]]
chipsetinit: Could not find the south bridge!
[[[ damn!]]]
Before VSA:
After VSA:
Finding PCI configuration type.
PCI: Sanity check failed
pci_check_direct failed
[[[ So, Marc, now what :-) ]]]
ron
Great! I bet that a stack
On Jan 18, 2008 1:52 PM, Marc Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ron minnich wrote:
[[[ here comes the bad news ]]]
chipsetinit: Could not find the south bridge!
[[[ damn!]]]
Before VSA:
After VSA:
Finding PCI configuration type.
PCI: Sanity check failed
pci_check_direct failed
13 matches
Mail list logo
