On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding bug-coreutils, to create a bug id to track this by]
>
> On 06/15/2010 09:23 PM, Peng Yu wrote:
>> I need to add an additional common suffix to the files splited by
>> split. Right now, I have to use mv to do so. But I feel it is
>> conven
Unfortunately, after checking BTRFS I see that fiemap
behaves differently to EXT4. IMHO the EXT4 operation
seems correct, and gives full info about the structure
of a file, which cp for example can use to efficiently
and accurately reproduce the structure at the destination.
On EXT4 (on kernel-2.6
On 08/02/11 10:14, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 08/02/11 08:42, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Do you think it's worth resorting to the FS-name-based
>> test when python is not available?
>
> I don't think so, because df can currently allow the test to proceed
> erroneously:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/h
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Unfortunately, after checking BTRFS I see that fiemap
> behaves differently to EXT4. IMHO the EXT4 operation
> seems correct, and gives full info about the structure
> of a file, which cp for example can use to efficiently
> and accurately reproduce the structure at the desti
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 08/02/11 10:14, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 08/02/11 08:42, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Do you think it's worth resorting to the FS-name-based
>>> test when python is not available?
>>
>> I don't think so, because df can currently allow the test to proceed
>> erroneously:
>> h
