FYI, I noticed failures that arose due to lack of an EGREP definition,
so I pushed the attached to fix them. Possibly specific to me for
using the very latest autoconf and/or automake locally.
cu-EGREP.diff
Description: Binary data
FYI, while preparing the --base64 patch, I noticed this nit, so have
just pushed the attached:
cu-dup-local.diff
Description: Binary data
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 1:10 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
> ...
> > - I'm inclined to work like the openbsd cksum and accept invocations
> > like "cksum -a sha1x" and "cksum -a sha1b". Any objection?
>
> Actually, I am now **disinclined** to implem
On 29/01/2023 20:40, Jim Meyering wrote:
Hi Pádraig! Happy new year (belatedly ;-). Hope you're well.
I'd like our generated announcements to be able to include
base64-encoded checksums without having to recommend verifying them
using openbsd's cksum, so...
This is so the checksums are shorter
On 30/01/2023 17:52, Jim Meyering wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 1:10 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jim Meyering wrote:
...
- I'm inclined to work like the openbsd cksum and accept invocations
like "cksum -a sha1x" and "cksum -a sha1b". Any objection?
Actually, I a
Not sure if this is a bug report, a feature request, or just a case of wrong
expectation on my part regarding the behavior of "tail --follow=name" when
the target is a special file (via a symlink). Perhaps what I'm trying to do
is unreasonable and shouldn't really be expected to work.
In any case
On 30/01/2023 20:04, Glenn Golden wrote:
Not sure if this is a bug report, a feature request, or just a case of wrong
expectation on my part regarding the behavior of "tail --follow=name" when
the target is a special file (via a symlink). Perhaps what I'm trying to do
is unreasonable and shouldn
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 10:17 AM Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 29/01/2023 20:40, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Hi Pádraig! Happy new year (belatedly ;-). Hope you're well.
> >
> > I'd like our generated announcements to be able to include
> > base64-encoded checksums without having to recommend verifying th
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:29 AM Pádraig Brady wrote:
> ...
Thanks for the speedy feedback.
> "If must be followed by white space." comment has a typo
> and also not enforced explicitly, so could be removed.
Thanks. Removed.
> valid_digits() may check beyond the end of the buffer
> in the case
