Hello all,
which filesystem is the best one for a partition
containg only maildir++ mailboxes?
We already use ReiserFS, but have a big IO-Wait.
(SEARCH and ORDER is slow on big IMAP folders)
Is XFS, JFS, ext3 (with journal and h-tree) or ext4 better?
Any recommendations?
Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hello all,
which filesystem is the best one for a partition
containg only maildir++ mailboxes?
We already use ReiserFS, but have a big IO-Wait.
(SEARCH and ORDER is slow on big IMAP folders)
Is XFS, JFS, ext3 (with journal and
Hello all,
which filesystem is the best one for a partition
containg only maildir++ mailboxes?
We already use ReiserFS, but have a big IO-Wait.
(SEARCH and ORDER is slow on big IMAP folders)
Is XFS, JFS, ext3 (with journal and h-tree) or ext4 better?
Any recommendations?
I take it you
If so, what changes will be required to our setup?
It depends exactly on what encrypted passwords means. It could mean
any one of different things.
1) LDAP connection using SSL
2) Encrypted passwords held in the userPassword attribute, which will
be accessible to the admin login
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:16:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
which filesystem is the best one for a partition
containg only maildir++ mailboxes?
We already use ReiserFS, but have a big IO-Wait.
(SEARCH and ORDER is slow on big IMAP folders)
Is XFS, JFS, ext3 (with
On 7/11/07, Brian Candler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:16:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
which filesystem is the best one for a partition
containg only maildir++ mailboxes?
We already use ReiserFS, but have a big IO-Wait.
(SEARCH and ORDER
Brian Candler wrote:
Then you can probably use LDAP_AUTHBIND to validate the passwords. However
this will only let you use AUTH PLAIN, not CRAM-MD5 (which in any case is
not a problem if users are connecting in over SSL)
Yes, that is exactly what we do.
Jay
begin:vcard
fn:Jay Lee
n:Lee;Jay
Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I take it you use Linux. Go with ext3. Not the fastest, not the best one
theoretically, but THE most stable when you use Linux.
OK. But which one would be the fastest (most efficient)?
Given that maildir++ is small files mostly,
Eduardo Kienetz writes:
hmm, this made me think about courier-imap... and my graduation project...
Sam, do you think some courier-imap operations could be parallelised
(via MPI on a cluster) to improve performance?
There's nothing much to parallelize. The only operations worth parallelizing
On 7/11/07, Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eduardo Kienetz writes:
hmm, this made me think about courier-imap... and my graduation project...
Sam, do you think some courier-imap operations could be parallelised
(via MPI on a cluster) to improve performance?
There's nothing much
Eduardo Kienetz writes:
On 7/11/07, Sam Varshavchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eduardo Kienetz writes:
hmm, this made me think about courier-imap... and my graduation project...
Sam, do you think some courier-imap operations could be parallelised
(via MPI on a cluster) to improve
11 matches
Mail list logo