Is there some place where I can search the mailing list archives? I've been
using Google but I would like to narrow my scope to just the list archives.
Thanks!
Lance
___
courier-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourcefor
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 10:52:43PM -0800, Jim Scott wrote:
> Is there an automatted way to take any message that comes into
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and move it to a shared folder as the email comes in? On
> another mail system using UW IMAP and Sendmil we can use Procmail to look at
> incoming mail an
On 2002.01.04 00:41 Lee Ming wrote:
> I am using qmail + courier-imap + vpopmail + omail-webmail. Client is
> using outlook express. But when I connect to my imap server, it only
> show up the inbox to subscribe.
> When I create mailbox at root, it always say no right to create. I
> can only c
Sam,
Thanks a ton for taking the time to reply to my question. I have posted this
question several times and never got a single response.
Now that I have the answer that you cannot share the Inbox, what are my
alternatives to doing something that work similiar to what I need?
Is there an automa
Hello
I am using qmail + courier-imap + vpopmail + omail-webmail. Client is
using outlook express. But when I connect to my imap server, it only
show up the inbox to subscribe.
When I create mailbox at root, it always say no right to create. I
can only create mailbox under inbox, how ca
Morten Wartou writes:
>> But if they use POP3, the users would download the messages to their
>> machines. Surely you don't have 40,000 users with 100MB mailboxes stored
>> on the mailserver?
>
> No, luckily not. But we have a lot of users with 10-20 MB, quite a lot with
> 50-100, and some hun
Jim Scott writes:
> So in the example below jscott has his own inbox with sub folders Drafts, Sent Items
>and Trash. In the shared folder he would have Sales, Support and Billing folders.
>What I have not been able to figure out is how to get an account setup so that mail
>for that account ([
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:30:51PM -0500, Greg Owen wrote:
> > I would like to cast my vote against this proposal. Not
> > only do I admire Sam's dedication to the RFC's, I also
> > support it.
>
> I say, go ahead and encapsulate. Sam bypasses RFCs when it suits him -
> the recent calendarin
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:30:51PM -0500, Greg Owen wrote:
> > I would like to cast my vote against this proposal. Not
> > only do I admire Sam's dedication to the RFC's, I also
> > support it.
>
> I say, go ahead and encapsulate. Sam bypasses RFCs when it suits him -
> the recent calendarin
> I would like to cast my vote against this proposal. Not
> only do I admire Sam's dedication to the RFC's, I also
> support it.
I say, go ahead and encapsulate. Sam bypasses RFCs when it suits him -
the recent calendaring discussions make that clear. I'm sick of getting
dropped from mailin
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 05:04:45PM -0600, David wrote:
>
> I sent them a stern email letting them know that messages formatted in
> such a fashion are not reaching their destination in the intended form,
> but I doubt it will make any difference...
>
> Sam, I admire your dedication to remainin
Hi Yall,
I'm sure this matter has been argued in the past before but
I've been giving it much thought lately. To me the problem can be stated as
this: Someone sends me an email telling me its an one thing when really they
are sending me something that is different.
Now thinking to how
I have just recently setup courier imap and have
some questions about shared folders. I would like to setup several shared
folders that certain users would have access to that would provide access to
email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So in the example below
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Morten Wartou wrote:
> No, luckily not. But we have a lot of users with 10-20 MB, quite a lot with
> 50-100, and some hundred with 100+ MB. Many of our users leave their mail on
> the server - and we cannot (and will not) avoid it.
So, use IMAP-SSL. Introduce it for those
Hello All,
I'm using the Deb Package of Courier-mta and I would like to continue to
do so, but the 8-bit header rules caught something going to a Dean and I
need to turn it off. has anyone managed to just re-make one chunk of the
courier source? I'm thinking if I can just edit submit2.C and r
- Original Message -
From: "Juha Saarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Morten Wartou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sam Varshavchik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: [courier-users] Re: Weird problem(?)
> > > If you've got 100 MB mailbo
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Morten Wartou wrote:
> > If you've got 100 MB mailboxes, use IMAP instead of POP3.
>
> Sure - if I can convince the around 40.000 users to do so (hint: ISP). ;)
But if they use POP3, the users would download the messages to their
machines. Surely you don't have 40,000 users
It appears buy.com also can't send out their addsheets/newsletters
without bad MIME headers.
I sent them a stern email letting them know that messages formatted in
such a fashion are not reaching their destination in the intended form,
but I doubt it will make any difference...
Sam, I admir
Morten Wartou writes:
>> Morten Wartou writes:
>> > We have just discovered that the Courier POP3 daemon reads through each
> emailfile even though we use the Maildir-format. Is this the intention? Is
> there any way we can get around it?
>> This is required in order to fully comply with the POP
Morten Wartou writes:
>> Morten Wartou writes:
>> > I guess it should be enough just to read the required info from the
> header - no need to read all the data. As I said, we use maildir, that is,
> one mailfile for each mail. We chose this format to avoid the system to read
> through all the da
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> (2) I create a file /home/imap/.courier-default with the following two
> lines
>
> || x=`echo "$DEFAULT"`; test ! -d "$HOME/Maildir/.$x" || echo
> "$HOME/Maildir/.$x"
> || x=`echo "$DEFAULT"`; test ! -d "$HOME/Maildir/.$x" || echo
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
>
> Does
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Varshavchik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:39 PM
Subject: [courier-users] Re: Weird problem(?)
> Morten Wartou writes:
> > We have just discovered that the Courier POP3 daemon reads through each
emailfile e
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Varshavchik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:39 PM
Subject: [courier-users] Re: Weird problem(?)
> Morten Wartou writes:
> > I guess it should be enough just to read the required info from the
header - no nee
I've been thru *most* of the documents that I can find (yea, when in doubt,
RTFM) skimming thru a very few that would not fit my particular case...
Anywho, I finally got Courier IMAP & the pop3 daemons running & answering
their correct respective ports, but am having a problem getting the
auth
Hi
Sorry Sam.
I shouldn't have posted the last message. I got a bit confused with the
$HOME/.courier-default and /aliasdir/.courier-default files but I
managed to figure it out.
Here's what I did.
(1) I created a user imap with a maildir
(1) I created a file /usr/lib/courier/etc/aliasdir/.c
Morten Wartou writes:
> I guess it should be enough just to read the required info from the header - no need
>to read all the data. As I said, we use maildir, that is, one mailfile for each mail.
>We chose this format to avoid the system to read through all the data for every login
>- with m
Eric Ward writes:
> With HTTP, a similar above situation works because the HTTP header lets the server
>know what domain name was requested, thereby allowing for virtual hosting with modern
>web clients. I suppose there's nothing of this sort available for POP3 or IMAP?
Correct.
> So, al
Johan Björk writes:
>>> the by courier-imap supported option "-stderr", which makes my couriertcpd crash
>if the file gets too big. Maybe you should remove the -stderr
>>>option then if it's not safe.
>>>
>>It's perfectly safe when it's used right. Just because this option exists
>>does not mea
Morten Wartou writes:
> Hello,
>
> We have just discovered that the Courier POP3 daemon reads through each emailfile
>even though we use the Maildir-format. Is this the intention? Is there any way we can
>get around it?
This is required in order to fully comply with the POP3 protocol, which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi
>
> The sample you provided works for a "courier-{user}-default" file but
> not a "courier-default" file.
You are incorrect on both cases. I provide a sample .courier-default file.
> courier-{user}-default is run under the {user} account
No it's not. .couri
>One way this has been approached in vpopmail is to pass on the IP address of
>the interface that the client is connecting to. A reverse lookup is done on
>that address, and the domain part of the PTR record is used to map user to
>user@domain. However, this doesn't necessarily scale either sinc
Hi
The sample you provided works for a "courier-{user}-default" file but
not a "courier-default" file.
courier-{user}-default is run under the {user} account
courier-default is run under the courier daemon account (i.e. courier)
Since any mail delivery to a Maildir by the courier-default file
Hello,
I have problem with mails that uses 8bit enconding in headers. In Outlook
Express these mails are not displayed.
As I see it was already fixed with this fix:
2001-10-07 Mr. Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* msgenvelope.c (msgappends): If we find illegal 8-bit header content,
re-encode it usi
On 2002.01.03 08:16 Johan Björk wrote:
> >It's perfectly safe when it's used right. Just because this option
> exists
> >does not mean that it can be used in every instance.
>
> It doesn't matter. A daemon that crashes because of a too big file
> (does it crash on disc full too?) is IMHO not to
Hi,
> > > We have just discovered that the Courier POP3 daemon reads through each
>emailfile even though we use the Maildir-format. Is this the intention? Is there any
>way we can get around it?
> > How else are you supposed to get the info for TOP/etc. commands?
> I guess it should be enough j
> > We have just discovered that the Courier POP3 daemon reads through each emailfile
>even though we use the Maildir-format. Is this the intention? Is there any way we can
>get around it?
> How else are you supposed to get the info for TOP/etc. commands?
I guess it should be enough just to rea
Hi,
> We have just discovered that the Courier POP3 daemon reads through each emailfile
>even though we use the Maildir-format. Is this the intention? Is there any way we can
>get around it?
How else are you supposed to get the info for TOP/etc. commands?
Regards,
Toni Mattila
>> the by courier-imap supported option "-stderr", which makes my couriertcpd crash if
>the file gets too big. Maybe you should remove the -stderr
>>option then if it's not safe.
>>
>It's perfectly safe when it's used right. Just because this option exists
>does not mean that it can be used in
Hello,
We have just discovered that the Courier POP3 daemon reads through each emailfile even
though we use the Maildir-format. Is this the intention? Is there any way we can get
around it?
Regards,
Morten Wartou
___
courier-users mailing lis
Ilkka Urtamo wrote:
> Hi
>
>I know this is a newbie question but i still am trying to get imap work
>without success:
>
> I have a problem that my imap server wont accept any unix users
> to connect. I had done this:
> 1. Installed RH72
> 2. configured, compiled courier imap with:
> ./configure ;
hi!
perhaps this is not the perfect place to ask, but:
in case i want to make major changes to the html-templates, i need to
understand in detail what the charaters all mean and how everything is
composed to a web-page. (e.g. what does [#P#] mean?).
is there somewhere a documentation about custo
Johan Björk writes:
>>> Yes, that's right folks. Courier-imap segfaults if the error log (-stderr) exceeds
>>> the maximum file size limit.
>>>
>>> On systems with a proper log rotation setup this problem won't occur but that
>>> doesn't matter, I reccon courier-imap should be able to handle a si
Hi
(1) Configure /usr/lib/courier/etc/authdaemonrc
* Change the following values
authmodulelist="authpam"
authmodulelistorg="authpam"
(2) Configure pam
* Create a file called imap in the folder /etc/pamd.d/ with the
following contents (all lower case)
authrequiredpam_unix
>> Yes, that's right folks. Courier-imap segfaults if the error log (-stderr) exceeds
>> the maximum file size limit.
>>
>> On systems with a proper log rotation setup this problem won't occur but that
>> doesn't matter, I reccon courier-imap should be able to handle a simple thing like
>this
I presume you mean the MIME headers error you see sometimes.
I implemented this patch yesterday. It seems to have had the desired effect.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=99vuki%24q3v%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.ed
u.tw
--
Ian Cass
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Kueh" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi
I know this is a newbie question but i still am trying to get imap work
without success:
I have a problem that my imap server wont accept any unix users
to connect. I had done this:
1. Installed RH72
2. configured, compiled courier imap with:
./configure ;make;su -c "make install-strip"
hi!
i always have trouble to get rid of the password-change option in the
preferences of webmail. in the version 0.35.1 the parameter
"--enable-webpass=no" didn't work, but i got rid of it with
"--disable-webpass". now, i'm installing version 0.36.1 but neither of
these options seems to work. is
Le Jeudi 3 Janvier 2002 09:44, vous avez écrit :
Hi,
I tried to use Qmail +Vpopmail + courier-imap + sqwebmail and when i
compiled courrier-imap or sqwebmail i became in both case the followin
message during the make command :
gcc -I/home/vpopmail/include -g -O2 -Wall -I.. -I./.. -o authuserdb
Hi all,
Is there a way to turn off the default RFC
compliance check? I am currently running Courier 0.36.
Thanks!
-Tony
49 matches
Mail list logo
