[courier-users] imap proxy

Hi list I'm sorry for probably OT question. I use stand-alone Courier-IMAP 1.4.0 SSL with Qmail/Vpopmail - everything works ok. Now we're going to redesign our network and implement DMZ/private LAN scheme. I'm planning to have two mail servers: one server goes to DMZ (real IP addresses) and ac

Re: [courier-users] Compile Problem on Solaris

--On Tuesday, January 15, 2002 05:06:49 PM -0500 Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. I am trying to compile Courier on solaris and having this issue: > > ld.so.1: /usr/local/courier/libexec/couriertcpd: fatal: libgdbm.so.2: > open failed: No such file or directory > > when I run the compiled

Re: [courier-users] Compile Problem on Solaris

> I use Courier on both SunOS 5.7 and 5.8 (Solaris 7 and 8), and I had to do the > following in /usr/lib (sorry for the wrapping): > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 25 Aug 4 10:45 libgdbm.1a -> > /usr/local/lib/libgdbm.1a > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 24 Aug 4 10:45 libgdbm.a -

[courier-users] Re: esmtpd TLS advertised but not supported

alan milligan writes: > Hi, > > My smtp server (courier-0.36.1.20011210) advertises TLS: > [root@mistress /root]# telnet balclutha.org 25 > Trying 193.165.250.58... > Connected to balclutha.org. > Escape character is '^]'. > 220 balclutha.org ESMTP > ehlo somewhere.com > 250-balclutha.org Ok.

[courier-users] esmtpd TLS advertised but not supported

Hi, My smtp server (courier-0.36.1.20011210) advertises TLS: [root@mistress /root]# telnet balclutha.org 25 Trying 193.165.250.58... Connected to balclutha.org. Escape character is '^]'. 220 balclutha.org ESMTP ehlo somewhere.com 250-balclutha.org Ok. 250-XVERP 250-XEXDATA 250-XSECURITY=NONE,STA

Re: [courier-users] Compile Problem on Solaris

I use Courier on both SunOS 5.7 and 5.8 (Solaris 7 and 8), and I had to do the following in /usr/lib (sorry for the wrapping): lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 25 Aug 4 10:45 libgdbm.1a -> /usr/local/lib/libgdbm.1a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root other 24 Aug 4 10:45 libgdbm.a -> /usr/loca

Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

Valdas Andrulis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Qmail without patches is of no use in real world. Ridiculous. Every MTA has its merits. Millions of emails are sent daily with stock qmail. -- Drew ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscrib

[courier-users] Suggested patch for RFC2045.

Hi, sorry for returning for this so discussed matter. In the patch below I suggest that there is NO change in the behavior of Courier related to email servers that violates RFC2045 EXCEPT if the environment variable IGNORE_RFC2045 is set to '1'. So for those who must accept these messages

[courier-users] etc/esmtpd typo

courier-0.37.0.20020112, file etc/esmtpd and etc/esmtpd.dist: ##NAME: MAXPERID:0 MAXPERIP="5" The ##NAME thing should also be MAXPERIP, shouldn't it? -- Kirill ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.n

Re: [courier-users] Auto-upload mail from backup server to main server?

Its easy to use, but if the documentation doesn't do it for you let me know and I'll send you a one-liner that works for me from a backup host. For those who are interested the advantages of this over a normal backup MX scenario are as follows: 1) Serialmail never bounces. If your DNS gets comp

[courier-users] unsbuscribe

___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

[courier-users] Correct Installion errors use webadmin

Just thought I'd put in a good word for webadmin. I walked through the install instructions twice. First time I did | make install DESTDIR=/var/tmp/courier-inst| make install-perms make test make install make install-configure I ended up with /usr/lib/courier/bin/sendmail that would only run a

[courier-users] Re: Auto-upload mail from backup server to main server?

Tim Hosking writes: > That's odd. I have a similar set-up and it just works. I don't have to do > anything to have the mail relayed to the primary when it comes back online. > Assuming that the backup server has an entry for the primary's domain in > esmtpacceptmailfor.dir/accept and that domai

[courier-users] Re: Still having virual host problems

Steve McAllister writes: > The courier virual host document web page is full of holes that no one > seems to answer when asked on this list. > > Examples: > the dot-courier man: > "The file $HOME/.courier specifies how messages are delivered to this > account"Who's home? The account's, of co

[courier-users] Re: Start IMAP server from xinetd?

Darren Spruell writes: > ultimately, wouldn't running it as a standalone (vs. inetd/xinetd) give > faster performance (Read: response times)? Not necessarily. Furthermore, couriertcpd contains built-in measures against denial-of-service attacks by rogue Microsoft clients. -- Sam ___

Re: [courier-users] Announcements low volume ML

http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/courier-announce HTH... Later.- - Original Message - From: Sébastien ROZIER To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 18:56 Subject: [courier-users] Announcements low volume ML Hi, I use Courrier IMAP and I'd like to know if the

[courier-users] Compile Problem on Solaris

OS: Solaris 2.7 Courier: 1.4.1 Hi. I am trying to compile Courier on solaris and having this issue: ld.so.1: /usr/local/courier/libexec/couriertcpd: fatal: libgdbm.so.2: open failed: No such file or directory when I run the compiled executable (using imapd.rc start). I tried setting the LDFLAGS

[courier-users] Announcements low volume ML

Hi, I use Courrier IMAP and I'd like to know if there is any way to get informed about new releases. Is there a low traffic ML for announcement ?   Thanx   Seb

Re: [courier-users] auth smtp for cleints but normal for other mtas

On Tuesday 15 January 2002 21:39, you wrote: > --Robert Penz wrote on 15.01.2002 19:55 +0100: > > I managed to set the setting that I want only auth smtp for my clients, > > and that works (AUTH_REQUIRED=1), but if I do so, no other mail server > > can send mails to my server (auth failed), it wor

Re: [courier-users] auth smtp for cleints but normal for other mtas

On Tuesday 15 January 2002 21:39, you wrote: > Courier works that way 'out of the box'. I've just reliazed that, sorry for the mails about that topic, i though that it must something compilcated, and so it was too easy for me ;-) -- Regards, Robert Robert Penz [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [courier-users] make check fails

* Kirill Miazine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020115 20:38]: > Hello, > > I'm trying to build the entire courier mta. Both ./configure and gmake > go without any errors, gmake check however gives following: > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory >`/home/kirillm/src

Re: [courier-users] auth smtp for cleints but normal for other mtas

--Robert Penz wrote on 15.01.2002 19:55 +0100: > I managed to set the setting that I want only auth smtp for my clients, and > that works (AUTH_REQUIRED=1), but if I do so, no other mail server can send > mails to my server (auth failed), it works if I put AUTH_REQUIRED=0, but than > the serve

Re: [courier-users] Start IMAP server from xinetd?

On 1/15/2002 11:14 AM, "Juha Saarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Daniel E. Sabath wrote: > >> I've gotten the Courier IMAP server to work on my Linux box (RedHat 7.1), >> and it functions fine. However, the courier-imap.sysvinit script doesn't >> seem to work for me. >

[courier-users] make check fails

Hello, I'm trying to build the entire courier mta. Both ./configure and gmake go without any errors, gmake check however gives following: gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/home/kirillm/src/courier-0.37.0.20020112/courier/module.uucp' Making check in module.local gmake[2]: Entering directory `/home

Re: [courier-users] Start IMAP server from xinetd?

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Daniel E. Sabath wrote: > No, I compiled and installed from the source code. You could've just created the RPM packages by doing: rpm -ta $courier-imap-version.tar.gz ... and saved yourself a lot of trouble. Now your files are likely to be in locations not so suit

Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

3.34 with a Exim 4.0 in the wings, coming soon as I hear . - Aly S.P Dharshi [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Administrator ORS Servers Student - University of Lethbridge - Original Message - From: "Peter C. Norton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 15,

Re: [courier-users] Start IMAP server from xinetd?

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Daniel E. Sabath wrote: > I've gotten the Courier IMAP server to work on my Linux box (RedHat 7.1), > and it functions fine. However, the courier-imap.sysvinit script doesn't > seem to work for me. What's the error message? It works fine here. > Since this incarnation o

Re: [courier-users] Still having virual host problems

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Steve McAllister wrote: > We cannot seem to understand how to do the virtual host thing. How far have you got? > We are hosting several domains and are trying to get courier to work. > Several questions come up and they could all be answered if there was > someone who h

[courier-users] auth smtp for cleints but normal for other mtas

Hi! I managed to set the setting that I want only auth smtp for my clients, and that works (AUTH_REQUIRED=1), but if I do so, no other mail server can send mails to my server (auth failed), it works if I put AUTH_REQUIRED=0, but than the server is open for spammers I did look at the docs and

RE: [courier-users] Start IMAP server from xinetd?

ultimately, wouldn't running it as a standalone (vs. inetd/xinetd) give faster performance (Read: response times)? -- Darren Spruell Sento IS Dep't [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sysop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:

Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

hi, Well security is a ongoing adventure actually. However both Exim and Postfix have good reputations. Regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > does exim have the security reputation (in the real world) that qmail > does? > -- /* Security is a work in progress - dreamwvr */ #

Re: [courier-users] Start IMAP server from xinetd?

Daniel E. Sabath wrote: >On 1/15/2002 9:31 AM, "Sysop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Daniel E. Sabath wrote: >> >>>I've gotten the Courier IMAP server to work on my Linux box (RedHat 7.1), >>>and it functions fine. However, the courier-imap.sysvinit script doesn't >>>seem to work for me. >>> >>>

[courier-users] Re: Auto-upload mail from backup server to main server?

William Hue writes: > "Bill Michell" wrote: >> >> You have only made a half-hearted attempt at a distributed system > here. >> There would appear to be two possible solutions: >> 1) Tell mail2 that it is merely a backup MX for the domain, not the > primary. >> Then it will automatically forward m

Re: [courier-users] Start IMAP server from xinetd?

On 1/15/2002 9:31 AM, "Sysop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel E. Sabath wrote: > >> I've gotten the Courier IMAP server to work on my Linux box (RedHat 7.1), >> and it functions fine. However, the courier-imap.sysvinit script doesn't >> seem to work for me. >> >> Since this incarnation of L

Re[2]: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:01:12 +0100 Kirill Miazine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: KM> > The last exim advisory I see from bugtraq is a format string bug fixed in KM> > version 3.30. What version is exim at now? KM> KM> Exim 3 stable: 3.34 KM> Exim 4 alpha: 3.952 http://www.exim.org : "New Things

Re: [courier-users] Auto-upload mail from backup server to main server?

First, thanks to all who replied "Peter C. Norton" wrote: > > You could deliver all email that you're intending to forward into a maildir > and user djb's serialmail to deliver when you want it to. Its pretty simple > to setup and should work fine with a virtualdomain setup for each domain >

Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

* "Peter C. Norton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020115 09:43]: > > These days that's akin to auditing a WinNT 3.1 installation, finding > > problems, then declaring WinXP to have the same problems. Silly, isn't > > it? :) > > The last exim advisory

Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 11:10:35AM -0600, Phil Brutsche wrote: > I think this opinion came to be in 1996/97 after some qmail proponents > grepped the Exim 1.x source for instances of strcpy and called that a > security audit (I might be remembering the details wrong). Its because the code didn't

Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

Phil Brutsche wrote: >A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > >>More imput wanted! >> >>does exim have the security reputation (in the real world) that qmail >>does? >> > >qmail's reputation in the real world is: > > * No maintenance - there are a couple bugs in the base qmai

RE: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > More imput wanted! > > does exim have the security reputation (in the real world) that qmail > does? qmail's reputation in the real world is: * No maintenance - there are a couple bugs in the base qmail-1.03 package that need to b

Re: [courier-users] Start IMAP server from xinetd?

Daniel E. Sabath wrote: >I've gotten the Courier IMAP server to work on my Linux box (RedHat 7.1), >and it functions fine. However, the courier-imap.sysvinit script doesn't >seem to work for me. > >Since this incarnation of Linux uses xinetd to start internet services >rather than inetd, I was lo

[courier-users] Start IMAP server from xinetd?

I've gotten the Courier IMAP server to work on my Linux box (RedHat 7.1), and it functions fine. However, the courier-imap.sysvinit script doesn't seem to work for me. Since this incarnation of Linux uses xinetd to start internet services rather than inetd, I was looking for suggestions on how to

Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > * Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020115 09:03]: > > More imput wanted! > > > > does exim have the security reputation (in the real world) that qmail > > does? > > Life With Qmail (http://ww

RE: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

--On Tuesday, January 15, 2002 09:03:41 -0700 Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > More imput wanted! > > does exim have the security reputation (in the real world) that qmail > does? Exim got the security reputation it might have because there was a chapter in it's manual on security a

Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

Qmail without patches is of no use in real world. Still there no easy way(or patch patch) to check of non existant users at SMTP session, not after that - bouncing messages to postmaster, because sender or sender's domain does not exist. So we have another problem - qmail does not check the valid

[courier-users] mailbox READ-ONLY

Hello, If I open IMAP mailbox READ-ONLY (with EXAMINE), I cannot delete/undelete messages, but I can change read/unread status of messages. Why does courier-imap allow me to do this? Quoting from RFC 2060: The EXAMINE command is identical to SELECT and returns the same output; howev

Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

* Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020115 09:03]: > More imput wanted! > > does exim have the security reputation (in the real world) that qmail > does? Life With Qmail (http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#comparison) says Exim has low security. I have no idea where

RE: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

8:35 AM To: Darren Spruell Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison * Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020115 07:48]: > Greetz all, > I see quite a bit of documentation and howtos on running courier-imap in > conjuction with qmail as an mta; I wonder

Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

--On Tuesday, January 15, 2002 07:48:55 -0700 Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see quite a bit of documentation and howtos on running courier-imap in > conjuction with qmail as an mta; I wonder why this is such a popular > combination, as opposed to the entire courier-mta suite. Ca

Re: [courier-users] rfc2045

--On Tuesday, January 15, 2002 14:46:52 +0100 "Thomas.Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i heard on this list that in newer (than my debian woody courier 0.36.0) > versions of courier-mta the rejects of malformed messages go away. > can anyone tell me from which version on, courier-mta attach th

Re: [courier-users] Re: courier-users digest, Vol 1 #1115 - 16 msgs

I don't use the Courier MTA, so I don't know if this is possible or even probable. Anyway, most network daemons allow you to specify which interfaces/addresses it listens on. Could you have configured the MTA to only listen on localhost (127.0.0.1)? On Linux and FreeBSD, netstat will tell which

[courier-users] Re: Courier-MTA on FreeBSD

--On Tuesday, January 15, 2002 11:57:54 +0300 Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Yarema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020115 03:04]: wrote: >> --On Monday, January 14, 2002 19:04:06 +0300 Odhiambo Washington >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>

RE: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

> Because qmail is so simple to install. Exim is also a popular MTA and > it's also easier to install. postfix is nice too. -nico ___ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users

[courier-users] shared folders with courier imap and vpopmail

Hi everyone, i have now managed to set up a shared folder on my imap server running courier and vpopmail Now, as shared folders rely on fs permissions for Acess Control and everything in vpopmail is owned by vpopmail.vchkpw im wondering how to set up Acess control for those shared folders. I

[courier-users] eureka ! authpgsql don't authenticate .. I found why !

Sorry if this message was sent 2 times Hi ! I think I found the answer for this problem and maybe require a modification in authpgsql code I used char type to store passwords ... to avoid records swapping when user changes it's passord to one with greater lenght of previou

Re: [courier-users] Disabling courieruucp

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 09:18:18AM +0100, Alexander Lazic wrote: > >Is there any way to not run courieruucp? I have no intention of using > >uucp and I've long been a member of the "if you don't need it, don't > >run it" school of thought. > > add to ./configure following option: > > ./configu

Re: [courier-users] MTA Comparison

* Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020115 07:48]: > Greetz all, > I see quite a bit of documentation and howtos on running courier-imap in > conjuction with qmail as an mta; I wonder why this is such a popular > combination, as opposed to the entire courier-mta suite.

Re: [courier-users] Re: Courier-MTA on FreeBSD

The port seems to already be in the ports collection. Check ports/mail/courier I hadn't checked for some time and it appears to have been just added. ed Quoting Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * Yarema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020115 03:04]: wrote: > > --O

Re: [courier-users] Auto-upload mail from backup server to mainserver?

on 15/1/02 2:28 am, William Hue at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've been using Courier since v0.29.0; great product! It is isn't it. > I have two mail servers for a given domain, call it "domain.com" for the > purpose > of this discussion. The two servers are at two separate sites. > > I've se

TESTINK Re: [courier-users] Disabling courieruucp

On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Ben Beuchler wrote: > Is there any way to not run courieruucp? I have no intention of using > uucp and I've long been a member of the "if you don't need it, don't run > it" school of thought. > > -Ben > > -- Matthias Andree "They that can give up essential liberty to obta

[courier-users] MTA Comparison

Greetz all, I see quite a bit of documentation and howtos on running courier-imap in conjuction with qmail as an mta; I wonder why this is such a popular combination, as opposed to the entire courier-mta suite.  Can someone shed light on the advantages/disadvantages of both? -- Darren Sp

[courier-users] rfc2045

hi all! i heard on this list that in newer (than my debian woody courier 0.36.0) versions of courier-mta the rejects of malformed messages go away. can anyone tell me from which version on, courier-mta attach the malformed message and dont reject? are there any problems with this version and the

[courier-users] Still having virual host problems

Several courier users that I know have the same problem and it has been posted multiple times before to no avail: We cannot seem to understand how to do the virtual host thing. We are hosting several domains and are trying to get courier to work. Several questions come up and they could all be an

[courier-users] Re: Auto-upload mail from backup server to main server?

William Hue writes: > Hi All, > > I've been using Courier since v0.29.0; great product! > > I have two mail servers for a given domain, call it "domain.com" for the > purpose > of this discussion. The two servers are at two separate sites. > > I've set up two MX entries for domain.com with

Re: [courier-users] Auto-upload mail from backup server to main server?

You could deliver all email that you're intending to forward into a maildir and user djb's serialmail to deliver when you want it to. Its pretty simple to setup and should work fine with a virtualdomain setup for each domain that you backup. You could just set serialmail to run ever 5 or 10 minu

[courier-users] Re: Courier-MTA on FreeBSD

* Yarema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020115 03:04]: wrote: > --On Monday, January 14, 2002 19:04:06 +0300 Odhiambo Washington > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >* Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020114 18:55]: wrote: > >>My OpenBSD 2.9 port came with

Re: [courier-users] Disabling courieruucp

Hi, On 14.01.2002 22:17, Ben Beuchler wrote: >Is there any way to not run courieruucp? I have no intention of using >uucp and I've long been a member of the "if you don't need it, don't >run it" school of thought. add to ./configure following option: ./configure [other options] --with-transpo