[courier-users] courier configurer in linux8.0

2003-08-07 Thread wlj
vi /courier/etc/courierd: prefix="/courier" exec_prefix="/courier" PATH=/courier/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin SHELL=/bin/sh DYNAMICDELIVERIES=1 DEFAULTDELIVERY="| /courier/bin/maildrop" DEFAULTDELIVERY=./Maildir ESMTP_CORK=1 UUXFLAGS="-j -g C" ESMTP_USE_STARTTLS=1 COURIERTLS=/courier/bi

Re: [courier-users] Courier MTA as a cluster?

2003-08-07 Thread Graham Leggett
Mitch (WebCob) wrote: It's not a function of courier, but of the operating system and file systems underlying it. In this case, the mailbox accounts are to be separate from the system accounts, as a result this can only be done with the mailserver, and not the OS or any filesystem. Regards, Gra

Re: [courier-users] Re: Courier-IMAP folders and filters problem(Bug?)

2003-08-07 Thread Michael Carmack
Tim Hunter wrote: Michael Carmack wrote: I'd love to get to the bottom of this. I was hoping it was just a Mozilla bug and would eventually go away with a new release, but it hasn't. Here's a document with screenshots that describes the problem: http://karmak.org/2003/courier-imap/problems/moz

Re: [courier-users] Re: Maildir file modification utility

2003-08-07 Thread DY
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > James A Baker writes: > > > > > Then, it looks for "recent" messages (those in the Maildir, but not > > previously added to the uiddb file, right?) and independently sorts [snip] > > sorted list of "known" messages. > > > > Right? > > Correct. The sort

[courier-users] detecting/preventing mail floods

2003-08-07 Thread Ricardo Kleemann
Hi, Is there a way for courier to detect/prevent mail floods? Say maybe restrict up to a maximum number of connections from any IP. Or can this only be done via a global filter? Another question, does dupfilter work "good enough" or is there a need for a better dupfilter implementation? If so, i

RE: [courier-users] Courier MTA as a cluster?

2003-08-07 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Graham > Leggett > > Mitch (WebCob) wrote: > > > It's not a function of courier, but of the operating system and file systems > > underlying it. > > In this case, the mailbox accounts are to be separate fro

[courier-users] [courier-imap] Folder deletion problem

2003-08-07 Thread Jorge Izquierdo
Hi everybody, I´m a bit surprsed about the behaviour of my Coureier-IMAP server. I have installed version 1.7.2 and everything works all right except when I try to delete a folder. I try to delete a folder with no message at all just after creating it and I get a message that says I cannot delete i

[courier-users] filters and outbound mail

2003-08-07 Thread ricardo
Hi, Searching this list I found a few messages related to outbound mail filtering but didn't seem to find any straight answers... Is there a simple way to identify a filter which is run only on outbound mail? I want to check some header information on all outbound mail, but not on inbound mail.

[courier-users] retrieving quota-value using authldap

2003-08-07 Thread Patrick von der Hagen
Hi all, I am using Courier-IMAP 1.7.3, as supplied by debian. Since I did install courier-imap and not the complete system, I did ask this question on the courier-imap-mailinglist before. However, I now believe that it was no courier-imap-specific question (and did not trigger much interest th

[courier-users] courier filter docs

2003-08-07 Thread Gordon Messmer
Could this section of "man courierfilter" be clarified: After initializing the socket, the mail filter must then close its file descriptor #3. File descriptor 3 is inherited by every mail filter that’s executed by the courierfilter start command. If the filter is added by "filterctl" whil

Re: [courier-users] Re: Courier-IMAP folders and filters problem(Bug?)

2003-08-07 Thread Aly Dharshi
I built the Courier-Imap package via the rpm method, I looked through the spec file and see no reference to --enable-workarounds directive so I don't know if the debian had it. Possibly ! On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 13:58, Tim Hunter wrote: > Michael Carmack wrote: > > Tim Hunter wrote: > >> Michael Car