Colin Dick wrote:
I am still having local delivery delay issues. Here is brief
description of my system:
...
approximately 1100 customers
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.60GHz
cpu MHz : 1615.935
hda: 156301488 sectors (80026 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=9729/255/63,
UDMA(100)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cdick]#
Mitch (WebCob) writes:
is there an indication of this?
See the imapd man page "verifying realtime concurrent folder status
updates".
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi all,
I'm trying to understand how the RBL checking is working...
I have it setup to check spamcop, using bl.spamcop.net, but
it seems to me bl.spamcop.net doesn't resolve in DNS?
I've tried using dig and nslookup to resolve the IP for
bl.spamcop.net and come up empty. So how does it seem to
wo
After a 4-hour blackout, I recently (finally) found the energy to get a
friend to secondary my mail server, but he now reports a number of
annoyances.
I have a hefty bofh file - manually adding a lot of badfrom and badmx
entries that kill a good 50-75% of my incoming spam. The problem is
that whe
Ricardo Kleemann wrote on Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:55 PM [GMT+3=MSK]:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to understand how the RBL checking is working...
> I have it setup to check spamcop, using bl.spamcop.net, but
> it seems to me bl.spamcop.net doesn't resolve in DNS?
Yes, it's normal.
> I've tri
--On Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2003 08:55 -0800 Ricardo Kleemann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to understand how the RBL checking is working...
> I have it setup to check spamcop, using bl.spamcop.net, but
> it seems to me bl.spamcop.net doesn't resolve in DNS?
Why dont you cop
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
[My shockingly obvious ls deleted]
> As the POP3 server says, Maildir is not a directory. Courier works with
> Maildirs, not MBOX files, though the SMTP server can write to MBOX
> files. Start with the installation instructions on courier.org, and try
Great, thanks.
I tried that, and didn't have any luck... then I figured out the problem...
I was trying to avoid running the fam program on my public interface... In
doing so it was running on my private interface but not on localhost.
Is there a way to specify the IP that libfam tries to connect
Ok, so I read that authpam uses the pam subsystem to authenticate, but
it does not use it to determine home directory info, which is pulled
from the system password files.
My question is this: How, exactly, does courier-imap pull that info. I
am using winbind, so if you make a generalized cal
Sean Kennedy writes:
Ok, so I read that authpam uses the pam subsystem to authenticate, but
it does not use it to determine home directory info, which is pulled
from the system password files.
My question is this: How, exactly, does courier-imap pull that info. I
Using the getpw API that has
Chris Petersen writes:
I have a hefty bofh file - manually adding a lot of badfrom and badmx
entries that kill a good 50-75% of my incoming spam. The problem is
that when mail comes through his server, the bounced messages go back to
HIM instead of to the spammer or a black hole.
Is there any way
With a release coming up, I'm now open to suggestions for additions to the
Courier FAQ. Anything goes, if you think that it would be helpful.
There's only one condition: your suggestion should be in a useable Q & A
format, rather than âHey, I'm tired of all the questions about X & Yâ.
Don't worry
Good to know.
I know and use a few apps that don't, and I was hoping to avoid any
surprises tomorrow. :)
Thanks again
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Sean Kennedy writes:
Ok, so I read that authpam uses the pam subsystem to authenticate,
but it does not use it to determine home directory info, whic
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > My question is, should my configuration be able to support 1100
> > customers effectively? Or are the 24 hour delays expected due to
> > spamassassin having to process each message.
>
> Only you can really find out for sure. It depends on who's
Hi,
is somehow possible to bypass global filters depending on the IP address
of connection (i.e. localhost) ?
Thanks
Lukas
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productiv
Ricardo Kleemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to understand how the RBL checking is working...
> I have it setup to check spamcop, using bl.spamcop.net, but
> it seems to me bl.spamcop.net doesn't resolve in DNS?
>
> I've tried using dig and nslookup to resolve the IP for
> bl.spamcop.n
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> With a release coming up, I'm now open to suggestions for additions to the
> Courier FAQ. Anything goes, if you think that it would be helpful.
Here are a few off the top of my head. I hope the aren't repeats. Use what
you would like...
Q: When I m
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> With a release coming up, I'm now open to suggestions for additions to the
> Courier FAQ. Anything goes, if you think that it would be helpful.
>
> There's only one condition: your suggestion should be in a useable Q & A
> format, rather than âHey,
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> With a release coming up, I'm now open to suggestions for additions to the
> Courier FAQ. Anything goes, if you think that it would be helpful.
I was looking at this 5 minutes ago, so I thought I'd send in two
or three that I sent to the list
Hi all. I just got the following bounce message:
--
Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
mail.courier-mta.com [216.254.115.84]:
>>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BODY=8BI
Lukas Vesely writes:
Hi,
is somehow possible to bypass global filters depending on the IP address
of connection (i.e. localhost) ?
Nope.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
We had a problem here where email in trash folders was being deleted
when we didn't want it to. It seemed that the default of
IMAP_EMPTYTRASH=Trash:7 was the problem.
There was a suggestion on the list (that I found when I googled) that
you could put
IMAP_EMPTYTRASH=
and it would disable it
22 matches
Mail list logo
