[courier-users] Compiling Courier IMAP 2.20 on Panther (MacOS 10.3)

2003-11-07 Thread Michael J Wise
Downloaded and installed gdbm. Had to create a 'bin' user (UID 7), but group 'bin' exists. The batch file: #!/bin/bash RANLIB="ranlib -c" CFLAGS="-traditional-cpp" CXXFLAGS="-traditional-cpp" export RANLIB export CFLAGS export CXXFLAGS ./configure

[courier-users] Re: "sendmail: Unable to submit message."

2003-11-07 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Ben Kennedy writes: On 07 11 2003 at 11:53 pm -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: There is no sufficient information to go on. The sender simply reports that sendmail failed with a non-zero exit status. sendmail normally reports an error message, before terminating with a non-zero exit status. The

Re: [courier-users] cur, new, tmp ... and arc?

2003-11-07 Thread Michael J Wise
On Nov 7, 2003, at 7:04 PM, Eduardo Roldan wrote: On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 01:48, Michael J Wise wrote: Will this break anything? Also, if so, is there a reason why it HAS to? Try to create some standard folders and use the 'folder subscription' of your MUA to hide them. So you're saying it CAN'T be

Re: [courier-users] cur, new, tmp ... and arc?

2003-11-07 Thread Eduardo Roldan
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 01:48, Michael J Wise wrote: > I'd like to put another folder in the Maildir for "My Own Use". > > What I have in mind is a folder where I could shuffle off all the > "Read" articles that were older than, say, 1 week, but still have them > around for reference from the shel

Re: [courier-users] Re: "sendmail: Unable to submit message."

2003-11-07 Thread Ben Kennedy
On 07 11 2003 at 11:53 pm -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: >There is no sufficient information to go on. The sender simply reports that >sendmail failed with a non-zero exit status. sendmail normally reports an >error message, before terminating with a non-zero exit status. The shell >script th

[courier-users] Re: setting up courier + mailman

2003-11-07 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Eric Pare writes: Users of our lists complained that they did not receive any message from the lists anymore. But on the other hand, other users replied to each other as if everything was fine. We had forgotten to increase the maxrcpts number in the bofh file. for more info, see the courier faq

[courier-users] Re: "sendmail: Unable to submit message."

2003-11-07 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Ben Kennedy writes: Sam, what's going on here? Can you shed any light on this? This makes half a dozen of us who have run into this problem, with no clues whatsoever. There is no sufficient information to go on. The sender simply reports that sendmail failed with a non-zero exit status. sendm

[courier-users] cur, new, tmp ... and arc?

2003-11-07 Thread Michael J Wise
I'd like to put another folder in the Maildir for "My Own Use". What I have in mind is a folder where I could shuffle off all the "Read" articles that were older than, say, 1 week, but still have them around for reference from the shell if I wanted to grep 'em. I'd envision something like this:

[courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size

2003-11-07 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Rodrigo Severo writes: Because any message transferred over SMTP cannot have lines larger than 1022 characters. Mr. Sam, How does the SMTP limit of 1022 characters per line translates to Courier's limit of 5000 characters per line? The SMTP limit of 1022 characters per line means that mail s

[courier-users] Re: The end of RedHat...

2003-11-07 Thread Bill Hacker
Joe Emenaker wrote: Bill Hacker wrote: turn on the Linux-binaries interface in FreeBSD in nearly two years now, and suspect that moving a build/tarball/RPM from *BSD back to Linux would be at least as easy as the reverse... And then wrote... A) 'Taint *about* "stability" - it is about choice

Re: [courier-users] Re: The end of RedHat...

2003-11-07 Thread Joe Emenaker
Bill Hacker wrote: turn on the Linux-binaries interface in FreeBSD in nearly two years now, and suspect that moving a build/tarball/RPM from *BSD back to Linux would be at least as easy as the reverse... And then wrote... A) 'Taint *about* "stability" - it is about choice of a common-meet-poi

RE: [courier-users] Re: The end of RedHat...

2003-11-07 Thread Jon Nelson
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote: > Bill, I'm a staunch FreeBSD supporter (*BSD in general as my second choice) > BUT, I see some things in Linux that although they aren't mature enough for > my taste, I'd welcome similar initiatives in FreeBSD - one however is a bit > of a sticking poin

Re: [courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size

2003-11-07 Thread Martin Arrieta
~# perl -e 'print"Blah: blah\n\n";print"A"x5' | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] 534 Message header size, or recipient list, exceeds policy limit. sendmail: Unable to submit message. it is not working.. and i try to change the courier/submit.C file and i get the same error.. when i have the probl

RE: [courier-users] Re: The end of RedHat...

2003-11-07 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
Bill, I'm a staunch FreeBSD supporter (*BSD in general as my second choice) BUT, I see some things in Linux that although they aren't mature enough for my taste, I'd welcome similar initiatives in FreeBSD - one however is a bit of a sticking point for Courier, and that is FAM's kernel support. Imp

[courier-users] Re: The end of RedHat...

2003-11-07 Thread Bill Hacker
Malcolm Weir wrote: -Original Message- From: Bill Hacker Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 10:42 AM [ Snip ] IMNSHO, the community *needs* and should value Linux-archy for the creativity it fosters, even if we choose to run the results of that on *BSD, OS X, or OS/2 for stability. Ummm

RE: [courier-users] Re: The end of RedHat...

2003-11-07 Thread Malcolm Weir
> -Original Message- > From: Bill Hacker > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 10:42 AM [ Snip ] > IMNSHO, the community *needs* and should value Linux-archy for the > creativity it fosters, even if we choose to run the results of that on > *BSD, OS X, or OS/2 for stability. Ummm... it might

[courier-users] Re: The end of RedHat...

2003-11-07 Thread Bill Hacker
ACK. FreeBSD & OS X (& OS/2 + emx) here. Ultra cautious, or just lazy, I guess - I value what sleep I can get. Found that article later, but missed the significance, as I encounter RH mostly server-side in the SME anyway - rare now on the DT. IMNSHO, the community *needs* and should value Lin

RE: [courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size

2003-11-07 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
No worries Jeff And shouldn't there be a limit? Admittedly the error message is a little unclear, but the line length is really limited to 1000 characters or there abouts, most mailers base64 or wrap at 70-80 characters... that's really just a "whoah! you've gone WAY beyond the limit of sanity"

Re: [courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size

2003-11-07 Thread Papo Napolitano
- Original Message - From: "Mitch (WebCob)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 13:32 Subject: RE: [courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size > I think everyone has missed the issue! (or maybe it's just me ;-) > > > >>> ruby -e "5001.times {print

Re: [courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size

2003-11-07 Thread Jeff Jansen
On Friday 07 November 2003 16:32, Mitch \(WebCob\) wrote: > > >>> ruby -e "5001.times {print 'a'}" | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Is really sending 5000 characters of a line of BODY text - right? I stand corrected. I just tried it and the text showed up in the body not the headers. And there'

RE: [courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size

2003-11-07 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
I think everyone has missed the issue! (or maybe it's just me ;-) > >>> ruby -e "5001.times {print 'a'}" | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is really sending 5000 characters of a line of BODY text - right? So really, what is being viewed as a header problem is a body problem, but really it's not even

Re: [courier-users] "sendmail: Unable to submit message."

2003-11-07 Thread Ben Kennedy
Sam, what's going on here? Can you shed any light on this? This makes half a dozen of us who have run into this problem, with no clues whatsoever. -ben On 05 11 2003 at 5:58 pm -0500, Jon Nelson wrote: >On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Ben Kennedy wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> One of my web hosting clients ha

Re: [courier-users] RE: distinct namespace with userdb ?

2003-11-07 Thread Carlos Paz
Julian Mehnle wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using courier (excellent!) IMAP in a multiple virtual domain environment. I'm using /etc/userdb for authentication. My problem is I can't have a user [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] with my current understanding of the userdb format. The

Re: [courier-users] IMAP-port safety on internet

2003-11-07 Thread Jeff Jansen
On Friday 07 November 2003 14:59, Swantje & Michael Ludwig wrote: > I do not plan to use ssl because you either have to pay for > a certificate or have to accept a safety clause before > checking the mail every time. Use imap-ssl. You can use courier's self-generated certificate or you can creat

Re: [courier-users] IMAP-port safety on internet

2003-11-07 Thread Scott
Swantje & Michael Ludwig wrote: Hi, I would like to hear your opinion on how safe it is to open the port 143 on my firewall so that some family members are able to read their mail via the internet from my server. I do not plan to use ssl because you either have to pay for a certificate or have to

[courier-users] setting up courier + mailman

2003-11-07 Thread Eric Pare
Users of our lists complained that they did not receive any message from the lists anymore. But on the other hand, other users replied to each other as if everything was fine. We had forgotten to increase the maxrcpts number in the bofh file. for more info, see the courier faq question : "Messag

[courier-users] IMAP-port safety on internet

2003-11-07 Thread Swantje & Michael Ludwig
Hi, I would like to hear your opinion on how safe it is to open the port 143 on my firewall so that some family members are able to read their mail via the internet from my server. I do not plan to use ssl because you either have to pay for a certificate or have to accept a safety clause before

Re: [courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size

2003-11-07 Thread Jeff Jansen
On Friday 07 November 2003 12:16, Rodrigo Severo wrote: > >>> ruby -e "5000.times {print 'a'}" | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> it is fine.. but > >>> > >>> ruby -e "5001.times {print 'a'}" | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> return : > >>> > >>> 534 Message header size, or recipient l

Re: AW: AW: [courier-users] authmysqlrc + MYSQL_SELECT_CLAUSE

2003-11-07 Thread Rodrigo Severo
""Bürkle wrote: -- ##VERSION: $Id: authmysqlrc,v 1.14 2003/05/09 18:15:15 mrsam Exp $ MYSQL_SERVER127.0.0.1 MYSQL_USERNAME courier MYSQL_PASSWORD *** MYSQL_PORT 3306 MYSQL_OPT 0 MYSQL_DATABASE mailuser MYSQL_

AW: AW: [courier-users] authmysqlrc + MYSQL_SELECT_CLAUSE

2003-11-07 Thread "Bürkle, Roman"
> ""Bürkle wrote: > > >i posted a lot, but i think i missed that one: > > > >when the authentification failed, i always get the following > error in the > >mail.log: > > > >Nov 6 17:37:09 tank courieresmtpd: started,ip=[:::192.168.0.1] > >Nov 6 17:37:09 tank courieresmtpd: > >error,relay=

Re: AW: [courier-users] authmysqlrc + MYSQL_SELECT_CLAUSE

2003-11-07 Thread Rodrigo Severo
""Bürkle wrote: i posted a lot, but i think i missed that one: when the authentification failed, i always get the following error in the mail.log: Nov 6 17:37:09 tank courieresmtpd: started,ip=[:::192.168.0.1] Nov 6 17:37:09 tank courieresmtpd: error,relay=:::192.168.0.1,from=,to=: 450

Re: [courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size

2003-11-07 Thread Rodrigo Severo
Sam Varshavchik wrote: Eduardo Roldan writes: On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 21:25, Martin Arrieta wrote: Hi all i have one problem when i try to send one mail with one line with more than 5000 characters. for example .. ruby -e "5000.times {print 'a'}" | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] it is fine.. but ru

[courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size

2003-11-07 Thread Bill Hacker
Bill Michell wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eduardo Roldan Sent: 07 November 2003 03:31 To: Courier-Users List Subject: Re: [courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size I don't find the RFC where this limit is specified, RFC 2821 and 28

RE: [courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size

2003-11-07 Thread Bill Michell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eduardo > Roldan > Sent: 07 November 2003 03:31 > To: Courier-Users List > Subject: Re: [courier-users] Re: 534 Message header size > > > I don't find the RFC where this limit is specified, RFC 2821 and 282