Re: [courier-users] Moving Maildir to new machine

2004-01-23 Thread Jon Nelson
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Jürgen Richter wrote: > Hi, > > i've set up a new server, which also should work as mail server. > So i want to move all mails - stored in maildir and accessed via IMAP - to > the new machine. > Which is the best/easiest way to do so? > What's about the "MailIDs" (e.g. 1074670

RE: [courier-users] aliase to /dev/null

2004-01-23 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
I THINK I have the answer on this... For an alias you would have to deliver to "| cat >/dev/null" (but the preferred way is to discard the message in maildrop). Do this by simply setting EXITCODE=0 and calling "exit": EXITCODE=0 exit m/ > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

[courier-users] Moving Maildir to new machine

2004-01-23 Thread Jürgen Richter
Hi, i've set up a new server, which also should work as mail server. So i want to move all mails - stored in maildir and accessed via IMAP - to the new machine. Which is the best/easiest way to do so? What's about the "MailIDs" (e.g. 1074670569.22996.mailserver:2,S) ? Will i run into trouble if i

[courier-users] aliase to /dev/null

2004-01-23 Thread Derrick T. Woolworth
In an attempt to create a bit-bucket alias, I added: bit-bucket: /dev/null To the aliases file, however the mail server says that bit-bucket at any domain is not recognized as a valid user. Is there a way to do this? Thanks, D --- Th

RE: [courier-users] /etc/maildroprc not being read?

2004-01-23 Thread Ricardo Kleemann
> > echo will output to the log file. > > I use it for debugging all the time. check the manual Correct, I use it a lot also. Isn't /etc/maildroprc basically a system-wide mailfilter file? Doesn't it support the same maildropfilter syntax as regular .mailfilter files? For some reason the "ech

Re: [courier-users] Re: RFC 1035 error V.S. First two MX entries BAD for domain

2004-01-23 Thread Kirk A Wolff
From: "Sam Varshavchik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kirk A Wolff writes: > (brokendomain.com). He says that his ISP wants to keep the first few MX > records broken, and that the problem is with MY mailserver. How exactly does his ISP's decision to keep broken DNS become your problem? Sam, I ag

Re: [courier-users] Re: compiling courier-imap without ssl

2004-01-23 Thread Rodrigo Severo
Dmitry Vereschaka wrote: Hello Sam, Friday, January 23, 2004, 2:50:51 AM, you wrote: I'm trying to build courier-imap-2.2.1.tar.bz2 and compile fails in tcpd folder with openssl-related errors (no header files) SV> Then install the header files. Problem solved. no. the problem is to remov

Re: [courier-users] Re: compiling courier-imap without ssl

2004-01-23 Thread Dmitry Vereschaka
Hello Sam, Friday, January 23, 2004, 2:50:51 AM, you wrote: >> I'm trying to build courier-imap-2.2.1.tar.bz2 and compile fails in >> tcpd folder with openssl-related errors (no header files) SV> Then install the header files. Problem solved. no. the problem is to remove dependance on ssl.

[courier-users] logs

2004-01-23 Thread Paulo Andre
Could someone tell me where courier-imap logs too, I have set up courier-imap and are trying to test it with a telnet, but I keep getting "Login Failed" and would like to trace the problem. Paulo --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCo

[courier-users] Re: freemail as local mail forgery test?

2004-01-23 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Mitch (WebCob) writes: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sam Varshavchik Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 3:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [courier-users] Re: freemail as local mail forgery test? Mitch (WebCob) writes: > Ok - any opinio

RE: [courier-users] Re: freemail as local mail forgery test?

2004-01-23 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
Glad to know it works for you... my concerns / thoughts were: 1) there was discussion about replacing freemail with soemthing that handled freemail better (which might not work for this as freemail does) 2) if I add enough domains, this will slow things down - so I was wondering if it made sense as

Re: [courier-users] ESMTP authentication/relay

2004-01-23 Thread Jeff Jansen
On Friday 23 January 2004 03:04, Kate Porter wrote: > I am still curious about one thing: What does AUTH_REQUIRED variable > do? I am still under the impression that all of my mail will be > rejected if I flip it. It does exactly what it says. ALL senders must authenticate - even ones sending

Re: [courier-users] Re: freemail as local mail forgery test?

2004-01-23 Thread Gerardo Gregory
Mitch, Theoreticaly speaking the methadology you are using has been deployed in network edge devices for years, and it is very sound. A common attack awhile back called The Land attack (affecting earlier 95/98 MS systems), was achieved by sending packets to a host, using the host's I

[courier-users] courier-imap login

2004-01-23 Thread Paulo Andre
hi, I have configured courier-imap as follows authmysqlrc: MYSQL_SERVERlocalhost MYSQL_USERNAME mail MYSQL_PASSWORD xxx MYSQL_OPT 0 MYSQL_USER_TABLEusers MYSQL_CRYPT_PWFIELD crypt MYSQL_CLEAR_PWFIELD clear MYSQL_UID_FIELD

[courier-users] Re: abuse@ and BLACKLISTS

2004-01-23 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Pavel M. Rebrov writes: Can I set up Courier so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any other particular use or alias still accepts mail, even from those untrusted hosts? That's not possible. At least, not easily. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[courier-users] Re: maildrop + mysql

2004-01-23 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Ricardo Kleemann writes: Or is maildrop + mysql only meant to be used for virtual user lookup tables when maildrop is matched up with non-courier mta's? Bingo. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature