Re: [courier-users] No SPF reject during DNS outage. How come?

Hey Alessandro - did you receive any replies not cc'd to the list? Just thinking out loud here... does courier cache lookups or is it possible your local resolver did? Maybe something cached the lookup of your SPF for your domain - and then the non-cached lookup of the IP failed... Could that

[courier-users] No SPF reject during DNS outage. How come?

Hi! I received a bunch of spam marked like this: Return-Path: Received: from [210.205.1.118] (softdnserr [210.205.1.118]) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:55:57 +0100 id 005DC042.56445431.5BFC Received-SPF: error (Address does not pass the

[courier-users] performance question

Hi, I kindly ask for a performance tip. Our courier server works mostly ok, but searching in large inboxes takes couple of seconds. Is there a way how to speed up search? Our server is a virtual machine on current generation xeon server: 1 virtual cpu 1gb ram We have disk on 7.2k rpm drive: 5gb

Re: [courier-users] performance question

On 11/12/2015 04:45 AM, Jan Müller wrote: > 13gb email in user inboxes (6 users) ... > Also, we are having problems with Thunderbird, our current imap > client. It's slow. It's global index, which should speed up searching, > has many UX problems and does not find every message. Any suggestions

Re: [courier-users] No SPF reject during DNS outage. How come?

Alessandro Vesely writes: Hi! I received a bunch of spam marked like this: Return-Path: Received: from [210.205.1.118] (softdnserr [210.205.1.118]) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 09:55:57 +0100 id 005DC042.56445431.5BFC Received-SPF:

Re: [courier-users] performance question

Jan Müller writes: Our courier server works mostly ok, but searching in large inboxes takes couple of seconds. Is there a way how to speed up search? Our server is a virtual machine on current generation xeon server: 1 virtual cpu 1gb ram We have disk on 7.2k rpm drive: 5gb email in shared