Re: [courier-users] 456 Address temporarily unavailable and aliases

2016-04-14 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Jeff Potter writes: Hi List, What is the expected behavior for incoming email, when: 1) The address is an alias, say, f...@domain.com, that expands to two local users, user- a...@domain.com and

Re: [courier-users] Soft quotas for Maildir++?

2016-04-14 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Jeff Potter writes: Is there a way to create soft quotas with a grace period for quota limits on a maildir? We’re seeing too many cases of users coming up against their quotas where we’d like them to be able to go over for some period of time, before enforcing. As for “why not just set

[courier-users] 456 Address temporarily unavailable and aliases

2016-04-14 Thread Jeff Potter
Hi List, What is the expected behavior for incoming email, when: 1) The address is an alias, say, f...@domain.com , that expands to two local users, use...@domain.com and use...@domain.com 2)

Re: [courier-users] ./configure option to install sendmail in /usr/sbin

2016-04-14 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 04/14/2016 02:38 AM, cour...@rcdrun.com wrote: > only that does not install sendmail in /usr/sbin where most other > software expects it to be. On rpm based systems, the "alternatives" tool will be used to put several links where they're expected: /usr/sbin/alternatives --install

Re: [courier-users] Best practice for SMTP level spam filter

2016-04-14 Thread Bernd Wurst
Thank you all for the answers. To clarify: Bouncing spam would be an option, technically, but we do not do that. For sure. I do have some experience with a custom localmailfilter but my question was if there's something ready to use laying around that I could not find. Seems like my use case is

Re: [courier-users] Soft quotas for Maildir++?

2016-04-14 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 14.04.16 11:03, Jeff Potter wrote: >Is there a way to create soft quotas with a grace period for quota limits > on a maildir? not (yet) >We’re seeing too many cases of users coming up against their quotas where > we’d like them to be able to go over for some period of time, before >

[courier-users] Soft quotas for Maildir++?

2016-04-14 Thread Jeff Potter
Is there a way to create soft quotas with a grace period for quota limits on a maildir? We’re seeing too many cases of users coming up against their quotas where we’d like them to be able to go over for some period of time, before enforcing. As for “why not just set the quota larger?”, we

Re: [courier-users] to much error DNS lookup failed, but testsmxloookup show good

2016-04-14 Thread PICCORO McKAY Lenz
i consultign and finally i got the problem.. i have 3 DNS in resolv.conf one of them are faild, the firts.. thanks in advance i now nknow the problem.. of course dns looks good if i not specify , but if i take one in particular got the problematic dns.. lavka@vnxpos00:~$ dig @200.31.4.70 mx

Re: [courier-users] to much error DNS lookup failed, but testsmxloookup show good

2016-04-14 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 14.04.16 10:09, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: >Subject: Re: [courier-users] to much error DNS lookup failed, but > testsmxloookup show good > >lavka@vnxpos00:~$ dig mx gmail.com > >; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R1 <<>> mx gmail.com >;; global options: +cmd >;; Got answer: >;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY,

Re: [courier-users] to much error DNS lookup failed, but testsmxloookup show good

2016-04-14 Thread PICCORO McKAY Lenz
lavka@vnxpos00:~$ dig mx gmail.com ; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R1 <<>> mx gmail.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: REFUSED, id: 34452 ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;;

Re: [courier-users] to much error DNS lookup failed, but testsmxloookup show good

2016-04-14 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 14.04.16 08:48, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: >3) if setup new linux box EQUAL AS THE PREVIOUS, got many errors with >default, only courier-mta ist installed, from sources compiled >standaralone, SAME if used oficial debian packages: >vnxpos00:/home/lavka/Descargas# testmxlookup intranet1.net.ve

Re: [courier-users] ./configure option to install sendmail in /usr/sbin

2016-04-14 Thread PICCORO McKAY Lenz
Sam means that the sendmail program must reside in /usr/sbin follow some distro specific standar and not in another place like /usr/bin or /sbin/ or similar.. i have same problem when compiling from sources (around the problem of DNS that not working) i got vnxpos00:/etc/courier# testmxlookup

Re: [courier-users] to much error DNS lookup failed, but testsmxloookup show good

2016-04-14 Thread PICCORO McKAY Lenz
2016-04-14 3:13 GMT-04:30 Matus UHLAR - fantomas : > > sendmail command is not smtpd and has different behaviour in some cases. i mean the provided sendmail command fake by courier, but either using a mail cliend does not work, see below the complete commands typing and log >

Re: [courier-users] ./configure option to install sendmail in /usr/sbin

2016-04-14 Thread Sam Varshavchik
cour...@rcdrun.com writes: I am unpacking courier from the sources and use this command line: $ ./configure --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc/courier only that does not install sendmail in /usr/sbin where most other software expects it to be. What to do to get sendmail in

[courier-users] ./configure option to install sendmail in /usr/sbin

2016-04-14 Thread courier
I am unpacking courier from the sources and use this command line: $ ./configure --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc/courier only that does not install sendmail in /usr/sbin where most other software expects it to be. What to do to get sendmail in /usr/sbin? Rosario

Re: [courier-users] What are recommended SPF options

2016-04-14 Thread courier
Hello, Thank you Alessandro and Sam for tips. I did not have yet opportunity to verify it all, but will do. Rosario On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 08:01:11PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Mon 28/Mar/2016 13:28:04 +0200 courier wrote: > > > > I am interested to know about Courier settings,

Re: [courier-users] to much error DNS lookup failed, but testsmxloookup show good

2016-04-14 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>> On 04/13/2016 03:06 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: >> > a question, why before was working and then now not? the only change >> > was a ip change, due are dhcp! >2016-04-13 18:09 GMT-04:30 Gordon Messmer : >> I don't know, but I might guess that the IP address that was