On 01.05.16 01:58, Alexei Batyr' wrote:
>I've realized that most reliable way to execute CGI scripts in nginx
>environment is proxying to apache with following minimal config:
does THIS make sense?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warnin
CGI scripts as
>FastCGI much worse than time-honoured apache.
but what's the point of proxying it from apache? Apache can run cgi (and
fastcgi, even php as module, not as fastcgi, so php should be even faster
under apache) too, you don't need nginx.
if you want nginx, what'
>On 05/02/16 03:16, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> Perl kludge suggested on nginx site for runnig CGI scripts as
>>> FastCGI much worse than time-honoured apache.
>>
>> but what's the point of proxying it from apache? Apache can run cgi
>> (and fas
>On 05/02/16 19:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> A couple of more points, apache with libapache2-mod-php requires
>>> the slower pre-forking version of apache and because that module is
>>> always loaded for every access
>> is it? iiuc it's only lo
quot; > "$COURIER_COMBINED"
On 14.05.16 12:32, Mark Constable wrote:
>FWIW I find that only privkey.pem and fullchain.pem are necessary.
maybe because fullchain.pem consists of $PUB and $INT ?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wis
but I just simply delete that file
>and quotawarn. The maildirsize file will be rebuilt soon enough.
isn't quota lost when you lose maildirsize?
I thought the first line sets the quota...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-ma
>On 25/05/16 16:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 25.05.16 12:41, Mark Constable wrote:
>>> There may be more elegant solutions but I just simply delete that
>>> file and quotawarn. The maildirsize file will be rebuilt soon
>>> enough.
>>
>>
ode error
>
>and rather than whitelist them I'm sure I used to just disable SSL
>via /etc/courier/esmtpd altogether (currently using v0.68.2)...
why not whitelisting? Why to avoid security just because some can't cope
with it?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http
>On 27/05/16 02:20, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> Some lame govt mailservers are still using SSL23...
>>> "SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:tlsv1 alert decode error"
>>> and rather than whitelist them I'm sure I used to just disable SSL
>>> via /
>On Fri 27/May/2016 14:39:59 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> % grep relay= /var/log/mail | grep sm-mta | grep -c STARTTLS=server
>> 261
>> % grep relay= /var/log/mail | grep sm-mta | grep -c from=
>> 1007
On 27.05.16 20:02, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>Cute, I gu
ead /root/.profile, ID is
>still blank. So su probably did not fully clean the enviroment (that's
>how I got into the test account).
there may be bunch of mess in your users' or system bashrc ...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I w
ain.pem for the particular
>vhost and Thunderbird worked perfectly.
>
>Brilliant! Thank you Sam :-)
>
>Just checked, Outlook for Android did not work. Anyone know of an Android
>mail app that might work with IMAP/ESMTP SNA?
do you mean, SNI?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk
06:48, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>Courier should accept postmaster@[ipaddress], where ipaddress matches
>the connection's IP address. It won't accept any other IP address.
what about servers behind DNAT?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.
LAYCLIENT?
I actually don't think tht RELAYCLIENT should be taken into account.
if the client has relaying privileges, (s)he should know hot co contact the
server admin(s)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to
>>On 29.07.16 06:48, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>>Courier should accept postmaster@[ipaddress], where ipaddress matches
>>>the connection's IP address. It won't accept any other IP address.
>Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>what about servers behind DNAT
installation of courier and
>ucspi-tcp, and if you're set on keeping addcr with this name I think
>we'll keep it that way.
if courier's addcr is a superset of ucspi-tcp's addcr, I believe adding a
dpkg diversion is proper way to go.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantoma
ion of TLS options in various config files.
... seems at least one difference was created at the time ;-)
should it stay in pop3d-ssl script or should it be removed off imapd-ssl ?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail adve
On 26.09.16 16:13, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>I have noticed that between courier 0.72 and 0.73 the
>"TLS_STARTTLS_PROTOCOL" option was removed off pop3d-ssl.dist.in, however it
>still exists in imapd-ssl.dist.in
>
>after some digging it seems comes from the
information is available in the man page.
it has other use for maildrop, as specified in maildrop manual page:
http://www.courier-mta.org/maildrop/maildrop.html
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address
here.
or, someone form FreeBSD to help you with installing libtool and courier
packages the FreeBSD way (ports), not manually from sources.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tut
lling distro, so it's expected to have very new
versions of packages.
However, the best distro is the one you can support as best.
any unix compatible system should work OK.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertisin
ecords, if
anyone's so stupid to disable ANY queries...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek r
s, and slow down your mail delivery.
>Well isn't that what they want, two quires instead of one?
>
>> That's why I think that getting rid of ANY is counter-productive. But,
>> it 's their call to make, so we'll go with that.
On 24.03.17 16:09, D
s to use its own resolver; and with its
>own DNS resolver code already in place, it makes no sense to use
>different resolvers.
Note that different MTAs do the same. AFAIK neither sendmail nor postfix
support gethostbyname() or anything other to look up /etc/hosts.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
On 26.03.17 18:44, SZÉPE Viktor wrote:
>Running bind is too expensive for me.
are you trying to say that it's more expensive than running courier mail
server?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this
>> On 26.03.17 18:44, SZÉPE Viktor wrote:
>>> Running bind is too expensive for me.
>Idézem/Quoting Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
>> are you trying to say that it's more expensive than running courier mail
>> server?
On 29.03.17 13:30, SZÉPE Viktor wrote:
>I&#
and why exactly sounds unusual and dangerous to you?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Despite the cost of living, have you
, with a preference of 0, pointing to that host.
Were you a ware of that?
I think it is very unusual and dangerous.
Do modern MTA-s - including Courier - implement that?
Idézem/Quoting Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
This behaviour was described in rfc 821 and 2821.
AFAIK all MTAs implement this
120 Jan 26 2015 /usr/sbin/sendmail
>
>
> What can I do to solve this problem?
Permissions on the sendmail wrapper should be setuid root, not setgid.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
This can lead to troubles similar to those you describe.
During reinstallation the system created the self signed certificate
again, but nothing changed.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Var
.
do you want to say that we'll be unable to disable/enable some protocol
versions as we did before?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akuk
lications to market and stay
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
> ___
> courier-users mailing list
> courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net
NS Lookup on the OUTBOUND Courier ESMTP Server?
how do you want to deliver mail to a domain when DNS does not work for the
domain?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adr
ore reason to
> >> be happy for using courier!
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > I somehow don't understand what you mean.
> > [...]
> > And how is this related to the mail cited below?
On 30.10.09 14:19, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> I never actually used libmil
> >> Although conceptually easier than I thought, a milter compatibility
> >> layer still requires a good deal of coding, though. It would result in
> >> duplicating many existing functionalities, e.g. header parsing...
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >
programs like vacation etc.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a para
atest stable on gentoo) needs another file(s) to include.
Did anyone have this problem and solved it successfully?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akuk
> 6 -rw--- 2 1004 1005 4780 Dec 6 03:16
> 1260094560.39840_0.mail.covisp.net:2,S
^
> $ diff 1260094560.39840_0.mail.covisp.net\:2\,
> 1260094560.39840_0.mail.covisp.net\:2\,S
2 hardlinks - aren't they hard links to the same file?
try "ls -nlsi&qu
ithout authentication info (even not through our servers),
we recommend to customers to use the same scheme - requiring authentication
(preferrably through SSL/TLS) instead of blind relaying.
I found it much easier to hunt for weak/stolen passwords and blocking
accounts than deal with relaying w
On 19.01.10 22:05, d...@tuxweb.it wrote:
> Is there a way to drop any "Received:" header (not the one putted by
> courier itself) from each mail before relaying it to an external
> destination?
why? to make spam filtering harder?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...
Hello,
a question after some time...
> On 10/29/2009 07:07 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > I would invite milter interface for courier. The present filtering
> > capability can't modify the mail (or can it already?) which would be nice
> > for integrating e.g. s
n to
"locals" will mean that all addresses in those domains would be treated ac
local - domain is ignored.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adre
[useless parts skipped]
On 24.01.10 15:05, Milos Prudek wrote:
> The owner of /var/run/courier/authdaemon is "daemon:daemon" in my distro. I
> need to chown it to "daemon:vmail".
why?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I
is to resolve the HELO name and omit this check if this
> matches the connected IP address.
note that this has two sides: spammers can create domain, point it to _any_
IP address and use it in HELO.
otoh, I don't think they would want to to that... does anyone has different
idea?
--
Matus U
On 09.03.10 17:00, Artur wrote:
> Which of the commercial antivirus software can be easily integrated with
> courier-smtp on Linux?
drweb has filter for courier.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising t
The cited part of RFC is very often misunderstood. It does allow the HELO
rejection for a different reason than "we found your RDNS being something
other". Refusing because of that reason would make changing RDNS practically
impossible. And it caused problems in history (that's why
On 24.03.10 16:34, Jorge Arias wrote:
> I'm trying to disable courier IMAP and POP logging to /var/log/maillog is
> that posible.
> Because the maillog file is getting very heavy.
did you never need to search in logs for users connections?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fant
A can be used in SMTP transactions,
which is often undesired.
I think that it would be nice if courier supported this, until there will be
better way to indicate that a host does not do e-mail (e.g. requiring MX and
not falling back to A/).
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.
t; This is the configuration i have for my localnet on file "smtpaccess/default"
> :
>
> 172
> allow,RELAYCLIENT,AUTH_REQUIRED=1,BOFHCHECKHELO=1,BOFHSPFTRUSTME=1,BOFHCHECKDNS=1
did you run makesmtpaccess after changing the file?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas
a}sh tend to reset the UID unless you
call them with -p option.
you can try
#!/bin/sh -p
if that helps.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek rek
of encodings is
>performed, so the recommendation in the DKIM specification is that
>only 7bit should be used, making 8bitMIME unnecessary.
doesn't that mean that DKIM is broken by design?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I
pecially list info and unsubscribe headers), and
therefore many mailing lists tend to modify both subject and body.
List software supporting DKIM could verify the signature and should remove
it, if it's going to be invalidated. It may re-sign the message using own
DKIM signature.
However,
this may cause problems in multitasking environment,
however I can imagine "locking" the space by e.g. creating temporary file,
checkinf for deliverability and then optionally delivering it.
So I could run the mail through an xfilter only if/when the mail can be
delivered.
--
M
ltered from phishing mail (abuse
reports). Unluckily it ain't so easy, since the data files are checked
before control files (recipients).
Does anyone have implemented this?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>> when delivering mail to a mailbox that could cross the quota in mailfilter
>>
>> - can I check if the mail was delivered successfully by the Cc command?
>> so I would e.g. forward it to another address only if it was delivered
>
> > Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> >
> >> And I'm still curious if I can find somehow that the quota
> >> notification has
> >> been stored in users' mailbox... I would like to send a message in
> >> such case
> >> to other ad
> Hello Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
>
> Am 2010-04-19 08:46:23, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > It's a filter for courierperlfilter that integrated into courier package. It
> > only has to process single e-mail, the rest is done by other infrastructure.
> >
> &
> On 26/Apr/10 17:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> Mails to and should be passed as they are.
> > [...]
> > On 19.04.10 14:00, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >> Is it not enough to catch the To: and Cc: from the incoming mail and if
> >> it is for
> Am 2010-04-26 17:25:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> > > Is it not enough to catch the To: and Cc: from the incoming mail and if
> > > it is for or stop the processing and return an Exit
> > > Status 0?
> Hello Matus UHLAR - fantomas,
> > The r
h "r"?
>
> How are you going to handle an abusive message for multiple
> recipients, only one of which is or ? Courier
> already has a whitelisted/not-whitelisted mechanism, but it only works
> for whitelistable filters...
hmmm, I feel to be a bit out... what mechanism?
--
Matu
> > On 28.04.10 12:59, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> >> You mean you read recipients from ctlfile lines starting with "r"?
> On 28/Apr/10 19:51, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > I already do it in our logging filter.
On 29.04.10 18:48, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
to others? So when first recipient is non-abuse,
only other non-abuse recipients would be passed and vice versa?
That way I could apply basically different filtering for abuse and other
users, which is what I need...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warnin
sting domains is rejected (if
BOFHCHECKDNS is 1). However rcpt to: is not validated the same way, so it's
quite often that users send mail to nonexisting domains.
... we are using a bit old courier, so it's possible that this is already
implemented. However I haven't seen any mention of
ngs and times out.
I have noticed similar behaviour with kaspersky antivirus on port 587 +
STSARTRTLS. 465 with SSL works but it may be related to kaspersky option
"don't scan encrypted connections".
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>> can courieresmtpd validate existence of mail addresses in the domains that
>> are not local (listed in hosteddomains/locals)?
> No.
oh :-(
>> We want to split SMTP servers from MX servers, and I'm curious if it
>> wouldn&#x
>> On 20.05.10 07:05, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>> This is typically done by exporting the user list as aliases:
>>> u...@domain.com: u...@server1.domain.com
>>>
>>> All nonexistent addresses would therefore be rejected as unauthorized
>>> rel
:
> I had AUTH_REQUIRED=1 commented out. fixed that and the internet could
> connect.
This should be set on submission (587) and smtps (465) ports, not on 25.
Unless there's need to run SMTP server that doesn't behave as MX for
anyone.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk
> On 05/26/2010 02:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >
> > What would I like to add:
> > - validate recipient domain
> > - validate sender address
On 26.05.10 20:32, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> courier-pythonfilter has a module for the latter. The former would be
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>
>> I'm aware of this. Unluckily, some of our customers tend to make many
>> mistakes so the mail bounce (and they quite often misconfigure their source
>> address so the mail double-bounces).
>>
>> Therefore I w
t mailing list, who refused to
provide SMTP AUTH and prefers relaying from local IP ranges without it.
>From Austraila iirc.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu
gt;>> be made whether the additional overhead is justified by the value
>>> added.
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>> I'm aware of all of this. However all (except sender address verification)
>> the overhead will still happen, but later in delivery chain, i
dress in queue?
Thank you
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
(R)etry, (A)bort, (C)
g and similar purposes (DCC)?
We have a script for courierperlfilter that parses data and control files,
and while I'm curiour for the first issue, the second could give some (spam
filtering) benefits to us...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I w
mail to the new address.
What is the migration you are talking about?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
It's now sa
okups for puertoislamujers.com timeout.
Their DNS is broken.
> I realize that the server at that address is not answering to port 25,
> but that should generate a timeout, not a DNS error.
courier even does not try the A and it doesn't have to.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fant
> $ host puertoislamujers.com
> >> puertoislamujers.com has address 74.86.203.162
> >>
> >> I thought that Courier would attempt delivery to the A record if there
> >> was no MX record?
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > how do you know it
g34679.html)?.
Is there any problem using MSA on port 587 where authentication would be
required and no blacklist would be defined?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu
uot;maildir over quota" to send quotawarnmsg
> which it now doesn't do.
>
> Or is there some solution to this problem which I have missed?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-m
> On 22/07/10 14:16, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > the user is warned daily when his quota is over configured size.
On 22.07.10 15:03, Jani Ollikainen wrote:
> What? When? How?
>
> I have:
> DEFAULTDELIVERY="|| /usr/lib/courier/bin/dotforward
> | /usr/lib/cour
.
Thank you
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam is for losers who can't get business any othe
s already passed your filters.
Well, even if mail from backup MX it will be filtered, backscatter from the
MX should not be that problematic unless you use your backup MX for sending
mail out.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-m
cepted or is it just something that
wasn't dealt with yet?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Fucking windows! Bring Bill Ga
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>> we've received a complaint about courier smtpd refusing trailing spaces
>> after DATA and QUIT commands, producing "502 ESMTP command error".
>>
>> The RFCs 2821 and 5321 both tell that trailing should be accepted (sec
asiest way seems to be setting
some global variables in those functions and checking them afterwards.
Any hint?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolve
ate courier installation accessible on different IP for
each group (which is in fact as complicated as separate virtual machine).
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chce
f the queue be
> delivered?
see queuelo, queuehi, queuefill options in "man courier". I think tuning
them could do what you want.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>> is it already possible to specify CIDR ranges in esmtpaccess file?
>> If not, is it planned? Or any other way to define less than /24 ?
On 10.08.10 18:09, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> If you install the Net::CIDR module from CPAN, this should work
e bandwidth you have
> available.
note that you MUST accept at least 100 recipients per message.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek rekla
.
If such hostname would be found in mail from: (or rcpt to:), the mail
would be rejected.
It does not apply for sending mail from such host (via reverse DNS), only
for specifying such address in mail envelope.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I w
hing:
>I have tried the "."in the MX record and the Syntax check for
>the zonefiles give a bunch of errors and it seems, that the
> "." break DNSSEC at least for bind9 in Debian Lenny/Squeeze.
I'd say this is kind of an error, since the . is (afaik) valid
>
> :-D which works and does not produce errors with the bind9 syntax check
> or DNSSEC.
This causes the "mail loops back to myself"-style error at receiving and no
error at sending time, unless you put 127.0.0.1 to "badmx" in BOFH.
Yes, I did that. It's bet
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>> We just do NOT currently have any indication to indicate that some domain
>> names in mail should not be accepted. SPF isn't widely used and even where
>> it is, it's not always configured for mail from: rejection.
On 10.11.
> > Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> >> We just do NOT currently have any indication to indicate that some domain
> >> names in mail should not be accepted. SPF isn't widely used and even where
> >> it is, it's not always configured for mail from: reject
2 and 2.5.1. Can someone confirm this is a bug
in maildrop or tell me where I've made a mistake?
Thank you.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>> I've executed "maildirmake -q104857600S ./Maildir/" over users' maildir to
>> re-count the mailbox usage.
[...]
>> however, the users' maildir contains more folders, of which one doesn't seem
>> to
>>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>>> I've executed "maildirmake -q104857600S ./Maildir/" over users' maildir to
>>>> re-count the mailbox usage.
>> [...]
>>>> however, the users' maildir contains more folders, of
ng purposes, you can also run maildirmake under
>>>>> strace, and save the output debug file.
>>>>
>>>> www.fantomas.sk/maildirmake.strace if it helps anything.
>>
>> On 23.11.10 18:12, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>> Try again and passing the -v and
>>> Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
>>>> it's on the same place. Looking at it now, does maildirmake count files
>>>> ending by "T" (apparently trashed)? And, does imapd?
>>
>> On 24.11.10 06:58, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
On 25.11.10 10:12, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I'm satisfied with current behaviour of IMAP_EMPTYTRASH but I'd like quota
> be counted on all files not in trash.
Is it possible not to count quota only for TRASH folder?
I have found relevant parts in ./maildir/maildirquota.c
a
both off (or change them to those esmtpd-msa uses)
I guess the former would be better since esmtpd-msa defined many options to
the same values we want in esmtpd-ssl (since we use it the same way).
Any comments?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wis
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
