On Jul 25, 2007, at 7:49 AM, Pawel Tecza wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> Do you intend to release a next stable version of your Courier
> under the terms of the GPLv3 or you still stay under the GPLv2?
Ack, I sure hope not.
--
Mike Horwath, reachable via [EMA
at why the build is failing instead of
trying to just upgrade around it. If it is a gcc 3.x requirement, so
be it, but it could also just be a 'problem' that 3.x just goes by
without mentioning anything.
--
Mike Horwath,
(!p)
return NULL;
n=ldap_count_values_len(p);
--> char **a=malloc((n + 1) * sizeof(char *)); <--
if (!a)
{
DPRINTF("malloc failed");
h the original PfA), automated webhosting setup and
reporting, network allocations, etc.
All PHP. Pretty clean(ish).
--
Mike Horwath, reachable via [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
f which are issues with Courier.
--
Mike Horwath, reachable via [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and
).
>
And it was supposed to look like the above?
Where is the plain text?
--
Mike Horwath, reachable via [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Fr
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:33:25AM +0100, Oliver Jusinger wrote:
> On Saturday 12 November 2005 20:28, Mike Horwath wrote:
> > Greylisting should only compare 3 items:
> > from address
> > to address
> > IP address (/32 or if using light greylisting, /24)
&
otherwise I need a new mailserver.
Greylisting should only compare 3 items:
from address
to address
IP address (/32 or if using light greylisting, /24)
That's it, anything else...well, not much you can do if people aren't
following the dire
sing size could be avoided
> if every incoming message is subject to a greylisting delay, but that
> gets us back to the case where legitimate users are penalized with a
> delay.
Bah, this is not a real concern.
> All this is food for thought, and I now want to reflect on this more
&
t onto the zombied machine, the more the user
will notice and clean their machine. Why would they want to lose this
avenue of theft?
As far as slowing down legit email - only a new message who isn't in
the triplet already will be delayed. I use 1
and on an
ISP system for the last year without issue.
It is a great way to deter zombied machines.
But it won't last forever, eventually the people that send us that
email we don't want will realize that the zombie machine can just
retry later, then it will break.
--
Mike Horwa
lf-signed just for fun and excitement?
Otherwise, QuickSSL works well and won't leave you too high and dry.
--
Mike Horwath, reachable via [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar hap
contentious issue with varying degrees (and
> decrees) of client broken-ness. CRAM, DIGEST, etc?
How about just SSL enabling all services and turn off the clear text
services to force your users into SSL only?
--
Mike Horwath, reachable
backscatter as a submission criterium.
Well, I don't know who you have used as an outsourced AS/AV company
before, but any I have used or checked out in the past actually do
verify remote before accepting *any* message.
Be careful with your blanket statements.
--
Mike Horwath, reachabl
n't know what that was supposed to do, either on the
client or the server.
--
Mike Horwath IRC: Drechsau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home: 763-540-6815 1901 Sumter Ave N, Golden Valley, MN 55427
Opinions stated in this message, or any message posted by myself
through my Geeks.ORG a
the current revisions.
--
Mike Horwath IRC: Drechsau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home: 763-540-6815 1901 Sumter Ave N, Golden Valley, MN 55427
Opinions stated in this message, or any message posted by myself
through my Geeks.ORG address, are mine and mine al
t
> uses the same authmysql daemon as Courier-IMAP?
There is a package for sqwebmail you can download as a standalone
system.
Compile it with the same basic configure commandline and you should be
set, there is no need to install of courier for it.
--
Mike Horwath IRC: Drechsau
the database itself as the
> bottleneck, not kludge something that shouldn't have to be a database.
>
> Maybe I'm missing the big picture here, fill me in.
Don't forget that the database system is already probably caching some
data, and a double cache won't necessaril
omers to do this, this
file would be maybe a 100 lines long for all 20K UIDs and would only
have lines for the staff that *need* a larger quota.
> Cu, Oli-"I do think bigger"-ver
Well, I think you and I aren't on the same page somewhere along the
way.
--
Mike Horwath
long time ago, and it did not work for me.
I have 3 NetApps right now, all with quotas, and some 20,000 UIDs. My
biggest quota file is under 3K lines long.
If you wish, I can send you, off line, how we have it setup using
default quotas and seperate quota trees.
--
Mike Horwath IRC:
nch of files (or the unreliable issue of multiple servers trying to
write to the same file - or the issue of mail being delivered while
the user is reading it causing said file to be out of date).
Just an idea...and something I am already working on with another
virtual mail system via vpopmail,
21 matches
Mail list logo
