[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just noticed that 'reformime -x' choke on an email with more than
one attachment with the same filename. When it gets to the second one, it
complains "filename already exists."
Is it forbidden to create an email with more than one attachment carring
files with the
One last thing I forgot to say about this patch. The main reason to use
it is to be able to get the original filename back.
The unpatched reformime already extracts all attachments with -xPREFIX
but it prints error codes and messes with the original filenames when
and only when it finds repeated on
Here is a patch that implements the solution I discussed with James
Baker for the automatic extraction of all MIME parts of a message with
"reformime -xPREFIX".
This patch creates one more flag for reformime: "-u" so instead of
"reformime -xPREFIX" I suggest "reformime -xPREFIX -u".
The -u flag wil
(third times the charm... *crosses fingers that message goes*)
On Sunday, Jun 22, 2003, at 14:47 US/Central,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just noticed that 'reformime -x' choke on an email with more
than
one attachment with the same filename. When it gets to the second one,
it
complains "fi
